My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 231414
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2023
>
RES 231414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2023 10:58:40 AM
Creation date
10/23/2023 10:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2023-2031 Housing Element City of Pleasanton | 12 <br />• Pleasanton is largely built out compared to neighboring communities, and the limited land <br />that is available is not designated for housing. <br />• Regulatory hurdles like lengthy permitting processes, high parking standards, and the <br />uncertainty of the entitlement process are challenges to affordable housing. <br />• There is general community opposition to high density development. Maintaining <br />community character was cited multiple times as the reasoning for this opposition. <br />• Workforce housing (for teachers specifically) is needed. Many people live in Pleasanton <br />for the good schools and the lack of housing for teachers is concerning. <br />• The City should provide means for seniors to age in place with modification to their single- <br />family home. <br />• Multi-generational housing units should be encouraged. <br />• Local businesses are having trouble recruiting employees and young professionals <br />recently out of college or just entering their fields due to the lack of housing affordable to <br />entry-level workers. <br />• The City should identify publicly owned land for affordable housing. <br />• Housing could be added in underperforming commercial areas. <br />• Housing should be promoted near transit (Pleasanton BART stations). <br />• Missing middle housing is needed that is sensitive to community character (e.g., duplexes, <br />triplexes, fourplexes, condos/townhomes). <br />• The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process is inefficient and time-intensive, often <br />taking over a year (i.e., 14 to 26 months). <br />• The City should encourage ADUs and streamline their approval. <br />• Many households in Pleasanton are cost-burdened. <br />• Many older shopping centers/retail areas are underutilized and could be converted to <br />housing or allow residential use. More mixed use should be allowed. <br />• Housing should be located near good parks and schools. <br />• Housing availability and cost are among the chief concerns of the community - particularly <br />for seniors, workforce, and disabled residents. <br />• Many employees at local restaurants work multiple jobs to sustain the cost of living in the <br />area. <br />• The City should have higher collaboration with non-profits and local organizations to <br />build trust in community and encourage use of programs.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.