Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Page 5 of 10 <br />Topic CS Policy Consideration YES NO Required Description <br />4. Transit <br />Coordination <br /> <br />A. Are there existing public <br />transit facilities (stop or <br />station) in the project area? <br /> List transit facilities <br />(stop, station, or route) <br />and all affected <br />agencies. <br />B. Have all potentially affected <br />transit agencies had the <br />opportunity to review this <br />project? <br /> Please provide <br />confirmation email from <br />transit operator(s). <br />C. Is there a MTC Mobility Hub <br />within the project area? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> If yes, please describe <br />outreach to mobility <br />providers, and Project’s <br />Hub-supportive <br />elements. <br />5. Design Does the project meet <br />professional design standards or <br />guidelines appropriate for bicycle <br />and/or pedestrian facilities? <br /> Please provide Class <br />designation for <br />bikeways. Cite design <br />standards used. <br /> <br />A class IV separated <br />bicycle facility between <br />6’-7’ wide will be <br />implemented on both <br />sides of Sunol Blvd. The <br />design is consistent with <br />NACTO and Caltrans <br />bicycle design <br />standards. <br />6. Equity Will Project improve active <br />transportation in an Equity <br />Priority Community? <br /> X Please list EPC(s) <br />affected. <br />7. BPAC <br />Review <br />Has a local (city or county) <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory <br />Commission (BPAC) reviewed <br />this checklist (or for OBAG 3, <br />this project)? <br /> Please provide meeting <br />date(s) and a summary <br />of comments, if any. <br /> <br />October 22, 2018 – <br />Pleasanton Bicycle <br />Pedestrian Trails <br />Committee meeting. In <br />general, the Pleasanton <br />BPTC prefer a Class IV <br />facility through the <br />interchange with