Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2: Water Supply Options and Alternatives Water Supply Alternatives Study <br />2-3 <br />DRAFT for review purposes only. Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. <br />Water Supply Alternatives Study-Draft Report.docx <br />2.2 Alternatives for Evaluation <br />The initial screening resulted in identifying four alternatives for further consideration: <br />•Alternative 1 – Baseline Project (PFAS Treatment and Wells 5, 6, & 8 Rehabilitation) <br />•Alternative 2 – Reduced Baseline (PFAS Treatment for Well 8 only) <br />•Alternative 3 – Two New City Wells (West of PFAS plume) <br />•Alternative 4 – 100% purchases from Zone 7 <br />To meet peak demand requirements, alternatives may require infrastructure improvements, such as <br />booster pumps, pipelines, and/or a new turnout from Zone 7’s transmission system. Infrastructure <br />improvements for each alternative were identified through Akel’s Water Supply Alternative <br />Improvements summary dated August 2, 2023, and provided in Appendix E. Some near-term <br />infrastructure improvements are required to accommodate future demands regardless of the <br />alternative that moves forward. This Study assumes that the City will fund and address these near- <br />term improvements (including pipelines F-1, F-4, and F-5 and baseline booster station BS-1 as <br />identified in Akel’s Water Supply Alternative Improvements summary dated August 2, 2023 <br />[Appendix E], estimated at ~$10.2M) in advance of implementing water supply alternatives. <br />As noted in Section 1.1, Alternative 1 (Baseline Project) involves constructing a centralized treatment <br />facility at the City’s Operations Services Center for PFAS treatment, disinfection, and fluoridation <br />(Figures 2-1 and 2-2). Based on Carollo’s 50 percent design deliverable opinion of probable <br />construction cost, the treatment facility would involve seven treatment trains with two vessels per <br />train and a system peak design flow of 5,800 gallons per minute (gpm), including 3,500 gpm from <br />Well 8 and 2,300 gpm from either Well 9 or Well 10 (Carollo, 2022). <br />Alternative 1 would involve replacing Well 5 with a new Well 9 at Amador Park, rehabilitating Well 6 <br />(renamed Well 10), and rehabilitating Well 8 to restore pumping capacity. This alternative also <br />requires constructing a new raw water transmission pipeline and improvements to treated water <br />distribution piping.