My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 PUBLIC COMMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
13 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 2:30:11 PM
Creation date
9/14/2023 2:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/13/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
20Y
Document Relationships
13
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\091923 SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Christina Casha <br />From:Victoria Labarge <br />Sent:Wednesday, August 30, 2023 1:12 PM <br />To:Mayor and City Council; Gerry Beaudin; Tamara Baptista; Pleasanton City Clerk; <br />editor@pleasantonweekly.com; dborenstein@bayareanewsgroup.com; Livermore Independent <br />Subject:Water rate increase <br />Follow Up Flag:Follow up <br />Flag Status:Flagged <br /> *** [EXTERNAL] This message comes from an external organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown <br />senders. *** <br />Dear Mayor Brown, Council Members and City Staff, <br /> <br />The purpose of this email is to implore you to revisit the rate increase and the timeline for such increases. <br /> <br />The reason I am asking this is because the mailer that was sent out is misleading as it gives the residents no comparison <br />to what they are paying today. It also doesn't take into account that the City will be capturing revenue from 55% of the <br />residents that were not paying any variable costs but will be in the future. How could a rate study have been done that <br />didn't take that into account is questionable as to any accuracy and leads me to question how this rate increase can be <br />put into effect without that analysis. I had the incorrect percentage increase validated by Citizens for Sensible Water <br />Rates Zone 7. This group recently met with the Assistant Director of Public Works and the director admitted that the <br />percentages as stated by the city are significantly lower than reality. <br /> <br />I have already submitted my letter of protest but am emailing because I believe you all on the City Council can withdraw <br />this and revisit the necessary increases taking into account 55% will now be paying at least a portion where they didn't <br />before. Also a new brochure needs to be sent out and who ever designed this one needs to be held accountable for the <br />lack of information and the serious misrepresentation of the percentage of increase. <br /> <br />Sincerely rate payer, <br /> <br />Victoria LaBarge <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.