My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 2:14:27 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1: Development Standards <br /> R-1-40,000 2207 Martin <br /> Zoning Ave. (Ex. <br /> District3 House)4 <br /> Minimum Lot Size <br /> Area 40,000 s .ft. 72,647 s .ft. <br /> Width 150 ft. 181.58 ft. <br /> Depth 150 ft. 399.92 ft. <br /> Primary Structure <br /> Front setback 30' min. 130'-4" <br /> Side/both setback 5'/50' min. 46'-10"/77'-5" <br /> Rear setback 30' min. 216'-2" <br /> Height 30' max. 24' <br /> Floor area ratio (FAR)5 25% max. 6.35% <br /> Parking 2 Spaces 3 Spaces <br /> Class 1 Accessory <br /> Structures (PMC <br /> 18.84.160 <br /> Front setback Not Allowed N/A <br /> Side Setback 20' min. N/A <br /> Rear Setback 20' min.. N/A <br /> Height 15' max. N/A <br /> As shown in City records, the existing single-family residence conforms to the recommended <br /> development standards; however, there are existing accessory structures (enclosed structure <br /> and trellis patios) which do not conform to the side yard setback requirements. Those <br /> accessory structures are considered legal non-conforming. Any additional development on the <br /> subject parcel would be required to adhere to the development standards established with the <br /> PUD development plan herein. <br /> The PMC does not address guest parking within single-family developments, but the City <br /> encourages, and often requires, on-site guest parking for single-family projects when there is <br /> no on-street parking provided within the project, as is the case here. The existing single-family <br /> residence contains an attached three-car garage and includes a generous driveway apron in <br /> front of the garage, approximately 33 feet in width which can accommodate an additional two <br /> cars, to be used by the residents or guests of the residence. Overall, staff finds the proposed <br /> development standards (except for proposed sports court development standards) for the <br /> existing single-family residence and accessory structures would complement and be consistent <br /> with the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br /> Sports Court Development Standards <br /> In addition to the proposed R-1-40,000 District development standards, the applicant is <br /> proposing site-specific development standards for sports court fencing (as shown in Table 2 <br /> below and described in Exhibit B attached). The PMC does not address sports courts and <br /> associated fencing. However, fencing (generally) in the R-1-40,000 District is regulated by <br /> At least one space per dwelling unit of the off-street parking required shall be located in a garage or carport per PMC. <br /> a Date from City Records <br /> s Not including garage floor area. <br /> PUD-148, 2207 Martin Ave. Planning Commission <br /> 9of14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.