Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2023-14 <br />Page Two <br />The Planning Commission finds the proposed development plan, as <br />conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, <br />safety, and welfare, e.g., vehicle access, geologic hazards (new development <br />not within a special study zone), and flood hazards. The proposed <br />development plan will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br />accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The <br />proposed development plan is designed in conformance with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan designation for this site and all other relevant policies and <br />programs. Any additional development on the subject parcel will be designed <br />to meet the requirements of this development plan, the California Building <br />Code, California Fire Code, and other applicable codes. As such, the <br />Planning Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan is consistent with the <br />Pleasanton General Plan and any applicable specific plan. <br />The proposed development plan includes establishing development <br />standards of the R-1-40,000 District, site-specific development standards for <br />sports courts, and retention of the existing single-family residence on an <br />approximately 1.67-acre lot. The Planning Commission finds the existing <br />single-family residence and lot size conforms to the General Plan Low <br />Density Residential land use designation with a maximum of two dwelling <br />units per gross developable acre. The Planning Commission finds that the <br />site-specific development standards for sports courts minimize intrusions into <br />existing neighborhoods. The proposed development plan promotes General <br />Plan Programs and Policies encouraging the preservation of the existing <br />housing stock and preserving and enhancing the character of existing <br />residential neighborhoods. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this <br />finding can be made. <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the <br />previously developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, <br />topographic features of the site. <br />The neighborhood includes a mixture of one-and-two-story residences with a <br />variety of architectural styles sited appropriately with its lot. The proposed <br />development standards would be consistent with those for those allowable <br />within the R-1-40,000 zone, which are appropriate for the existing 1.67-acre <br />lot, and compatible with the land use pattern and existing developed <br />properties in the vicinity. With consideration to existing accessory structures <br />in the vicinity, the proposed sports court development standards are <br />compatible with previously developed properties and established <br />development standards of surrounding Planning Unit Development Districts. <br />The subject parcel is flat with mature existing vegetation. As such, the <br />Planning Commission finds the existing single-family residence is sensitive to <br />the existing trees and vegetation on-site. The Planning Commission <br />concludes this finding can be made.