6 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-148, 2207 Martin Ave. Planning Commission 2 of 14 Plan and zoning district, and that the partially-constructed sports court would be compliant with the proposed development standards if it is reconstructed in accordance with staff’s recommendations. The application is now before the Planning Commission for consideration. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application to the City Council. BACKGROUND The property at 2207 Martin Avenue is located near the north end of Martin Avenue and is part of the Mohr-Martin area, generally defined by Martin Avenue, Mohr Avenue, the former Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and Stoneridge Drive. The Mohr-Martin area comprises predominantly residential uses of varying densities and home designs. Many of the properties within the area were originally located in unincorporated Alameda County, but were progressively annexed into the City of Pleasanton during the 1990’s. Thus, many of these properties were subdivided and developed in conformance to planning, zoning, and construction standards of Alameda County. On April 1, 1997, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1709 for RZ-97-2, which pre-zoned the subject property to the PUD-LDR District, as part of a larger approximately 34.5-acre area, for a maximum density “approaching” 2.0 dwelling units per acre1. The property was annexed into the City of Pleasanton in 1997. In 2021, the City Council approved PUD-140 and P21-0079 per Ordinance 2223 at 2207 Martin Avenue, which included Minor Subdivision approval to subdivide the approximately 1.67-acre parcel into two parcels (A and B). Parcel A, fronting Dennis Drive (no address), measuring approximately 21,794 square feet and Parcel B (2207 Martin Avenue) approximately 48,311 square feet. The application included a Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to retain the existing residence and related improvements on Parcel B and to construct a two-story residence and related site improvements on Parcel A. Although approved, per the conditions of approval, the PUD development plan would lapse two years from the effective date (November 5, 2021) of the ordinance unless a parcel map is approved. To date, a parcel map has not been approved and will expire on November 5, 2023. The applicant/property owners do not wish to pursue the approved PUD development plan that calls for a subdivision with required site improvements. Rather, the applicant/property owners intend to maintain the property as a single lot with the purpose to construct a tennis court with fencing where the two-story residence would be located under PUD-140. In July 2022, the City’s Code Enforcement staff received a com plaint about concrete flatwork2 being conducted on the subject parcel to create a sports court. While flatwork such as the sports court does not require a building permit, Code Enforcement staff contacted the applicant/property owners to inquire about the nature of the work taking place and notified them that any additional work, beyond flatwork, such as lighting or fencing for the sports court may require permits and/or planning approval, and to contact the Permit Center for specific information. In August 2022, the applicant/property owners contacted Planning staff to request development standards for the construction of a tennis court with associated fencing and lighting . Due to the 1 The Agenda Report for this item clarifies the allowable density as “maximum density approaching 2 du/ac (i.e., 1.999…du/ac). 2 Flatwork includes work such as pouring a concrete slab or patio.