My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
08-23_SPECIAL
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 10:31:38 AM
Creation date
8/16/2023 10:26:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/23/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
PLAN1
Created:
8/16/2023 10:26 AM
Modified:
8/16/2023 10:26 AM
Text:
mailto:jsoo@cityofpleasantonca.gov
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P19-0379, 1 Brozosky Hill Lane Planning Commission <br />Analysis <br />The EVAs on Lot 22 (Berlogar’s site) and Lot 25 (Reznick’s site) have been rerouted as <br />part of the development approvals. As such, the connecting segment on the project site <br />has become obsolete. Staff has conferred this item with LPFD and determined the <br />proposed development would not be required to complete this EVA segment. <br /> <br />Discussion Point No. 3: Would the Planning Commission be supportive of removing this <br />now obsolete EVA connector from the project site? <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Public notices were sent to all property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the subject <br />property. At the time this report was written, staff had not received any comments. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br />The VACSP embodies several objectives for Hillside Residential development. Such <br />development should be clustered in well-defined areas, while at the same time preserving <br />natural features such as heritage trees, hilltops, creeks, and steep slopes. At the same time, <br />the visual prominence of new development should be minimized by utilizing existing site <br />features, and open space area should be preserved. Achieving all these objectives on this site <br />is difficult. Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the attached material, take <br />public testimony, and make suggestions/comments to the applicant and staff regarding the <br />development of the site. <br /> <br /> <br />Primary Author: <br />Jenny Soo, Associate Planner, 925-931-5615 or jsoo@cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.