My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
071823 SPECIAL
>
18 SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2023 12:35:48 PM
Creation date
7/18/2023 12:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/18/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> 4 4 <br /> <br />The length of the loan is 5 years, which is longer than the forecast period of 3 <br />years. When considering how much of the rate increase is for the loan, Raftelis <br />used only the amount that would be paid back during the 3-year forecast period. <br />11% represents the amount of the rate increase over the forecast period used to <br />pay back three years of the loan. The loan would still have two more years before <br />maturity. <br /> <br />15. Why not use a longer payback for the elements that have a longer useful <br />life? <br />As this is for Phase 1 of the rate study which addresses near term improvements <br />to the water system, this is included as short-term borrowing. <br /> <br />16. Could the rate increase be adjusted if the $6 million loan was provided by <br />the City's General Fund with no interest charged on repayment? What <br />would that look like (in dollars) for a typical customer on their bi-monthly <br />bill? Is it a yearly reduction of approximately 3.6% of the proposed rates <br />(spreading the 11% evenly across 3 years)? <br />If the debt is issued as a 0% interest rate loan, the rate increase in Year 3 could <br />be lowered from 12% to 10%. The bill impact is almost negligible for customers: <br />it decreases the fixed charge by approximately $0.15 and the commodity charge <br />by roughly $0.13, depending on the customer class. <br /> <br />11% represents the amount of the rate increase over the forecast period used to <br />pay back three years of the loan. It is not 11% per year, but 11% of the total. <br /> <br /> <br />Rate study report: <br /> <br />17. Explain why the 2019 rate study was delayed due to COVID and the <br />executive summary appears not to be fully updated? Similarly, the rate <br />study implies the 2019 work was done ‘culminating in 5 years’. <br />In 2019, the City contracted with Raftelis to conduct a five-year rate study. Due to <br />COVID and the subsequent suspension of the PFAS treatment and well <br />rehabilitation project, the rate study was also paused. On April 18, 2023, the City <br />Council approved a fourth amendment with Raftelis to re-initiate this rate study. <br /> <br />18. Why is the Raftelis rate study labeled draft? <br />Both the Public Hearing notice and the Raftelis water study report are marked <br />draft until the Council‘s initial consideration of the proposed rates. Following
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.