My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
071823 SPECIAL
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2023 1:11:25 PM
Creation date
7/12/2023 12:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/18/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7/11/2023 <br /> Conclusions: Life in Pleasanton <br /> • Overall, residents are largely satisfied with life in Pleasanton, and with the <br /> provision of many City services and programs. <br /> • However, there has been a decline in the intensity of satisfaction on a <br /> number of key indicators since 2017, indicating a new, lower plateau. <br /> • 91% rate Pleasanton an "excellent" or "good" place to live — numbers as <br /> high as any place in the Bay Area, and in line with prior years. <br /> • 89% call it a good or excellent place to raise children as well, and parents <br /> are just as likely as residents overall to appreciate it as a place to raise <br /> children. <br /> • 93% say they feel safe here, and broad majorities are satisfied with police <br /> protection. <br /> • Housing costs are a top-of-mind concern, and particularly for young and <br /> lower-income residents. "Too much growth" is more of a concern for <br /> homeowners and older residents. <br /> • At the same time, 73% are satisfied with the quality of development, in <br /> line with 2017. <br /> FM3 <br /> ESEARCH <br /> 43 <br /> Conclusions: City Government and Services <br /> • Services related to local water provision continue to have lower <br /> satisfaction levels relative to how important those services are <br /> perceived. <br /> • The City also gets great marks on service provision in general; they <br /> are more mixed on evaluations of the City's planning for future <br /> infrastructure needs, and a decent share don't know enough to rate <br /> on budget and finances. <br /> • While only half feel the city needs more funding, in general, two- <br /> thirds support the concept of a bond for infrastructure needs, <br /> especially water infrastructure. <br /> • Most residents who have interacted with City staff have dealt with <br /> the police and utilities departments. <br /> • Customer satisfaction remains very high. <br /> • Friends, neighbors, and a text from the City are the platforms they <br /> are most likely to pay attention to. <br /> FM3 <br /> ESEARCH <br /> 44 <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.