Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br />Bill <br />Number <br />Topic Summary <br />agency makes written findings, within 30 days of the receipt <br />of a completed application, that not imposing or enforcing <br />minimum automobile parking requirements on the <br />development would have a substantially negative impact, <br />supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the <br />record, on the public agency’s ability to meet its share of <br />specified housing needs or existing residential or <br />commercial parking within 1/2 mile of the housing <br />development. <br /> <br />AB 2221 <br /> <br />Accessory <br />Dwelling Units <br /> <br />This bill would specify that an accessory dwelling unit that <br />is detached from the proposed or existing primary dwelling <br />may include a detached garage. <br />SB 897 This bill would require that the standards imposed on <br />accessory dwelling units be objective. For purposes of this <br />requirement, the bill would define “objective standard” as a <br />standard that involves no personal or subjective judgment <br />by a public official and is uniformly verifiable, as specified. <br />The bill would also increase the minimum height of a <br />detached ADU that must be permitted, to 18 feet or 25 feet, <br />depending on the circumstance. <br />AB 2334 Density Bonus <br />Law <br />This bill allows for extra height and density for projects in <br />“Very Low Vehicle Miles Traveled” (VMT) areas for 100% <br />affordable projects. <br /> <br />Analysis <br />The following provides an initial analysis of some of the key housing -related bills outlined in <br />Table 1. Staff notes that much of the legislation is complex and there are many areas of <br />ambiguity in the verbiage of each law. The full implications and details of implementation and <br />interpretation are likely to emerge over coming months and years as projects come forward, <br />additional guidance is developed by HCD and other entities, and as new case law is <br />established. <br /> <br />AB 2011 (Wicks) and SB 6 (Caballero) <br />AB2011 and SB 6 are two separate bills, with the common element of facilitating development <br />of housing projects on sites zoned for commercial uses, although there are some key <br />differences between the two. Similarities and differences between the two are described <br />below. Note that a project must apply under either AB 2011 or SB 6 – their provisions cannot <br />be combined. Exhibit A includes a summary of the two bills developed by ABAG/MTC, which <br />provides a useful side-by-side comparison. <br /> <br />AB 2011 <br />AB 2011 creates a streamlined, ministerial approval process for multifamily housing <br />developments on commercially zoned property. Developments are subject to affordability