My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 231406
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2023
>
RES 231406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2023 4:41:56 PM
Creation date
6/27/2023 3:49:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/20/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
559
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2023-2031 Housing Element City of Pleasanton | 12 <br /> Regulatory hurdles like lengthy permitting processes, high parking standards, and the <br />uncertainty of the entitlement process are challenges to affordable housing. <br /> There is general community opposition to high density development. Maintaining <br />community character was cited multiple times as the reasoning for this opposition. <br /> Workforce housing (for teachers specifically) is needed. Many people live in Pleasanton <br />for the good schools and the lack of housing for teachers is concerning. <br /> The City should provide means for seniors to age in place with modification to their single- <br />family home. <br /> Multi-generational housing units should be encouraged. <br /> Local businesses are having trouble recruiting employees and young professionals <br />recently out of college or just entering their fields due to the lack of housing affordable to <br />entry-level workers. <br /> The City should identify publicly owned land for affordable housing. <br /> Housing could be added in underperforming commercial areas. <br /> Housing should be promoted near transit (Pleasanton BART stations). <br /> Missing middle housing is needed that is sensitive to community character (e.g., duplexes, <br />triplexes, fourplexes, condos/townhomes). <br /> The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process is inefficient and time-intensive, often <br />taking over a year (i.e., 14 to 26 months). <br /> The City should encourage ADUs and streamline their approval. <br /> Many households in Pleasanton are cost-burdened. <br /> Many older shopping centers/retail areas are underutilized and could be converted to <br />housing or allow residential use. More mixed use should be allowed. <br /> Housing should be located near good parks and schools. <br /> Housing availability and cost are among the chief concerns of the community - particularly <br />for seniors, workforce, and disabled residents. <br /> Many employees at local restaurants work multiple jobs to sustain the cost of living in the <br />area. <br /> The City should have higher collaboration with non-profits and local organizations to <br />build trust in community and encourage use of programs. <br /> Some residents fear risk of displacement due to rising rents, and others have moved out <br />of Pleasanton as they cannot afford to live here anymore.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.