Laserfiche WebLink
L1VEFV ®RE <br /> CALIFORNI COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE <br /> C124 Comment: <br /> 3. The Airport Development Policy does not address requirements for CEQA /NEPA environmental <br /> review. As noted in the preface,whether based on an individual proposal or a more comprehensive plan <br /> (as Pleasanton suggests may be appropriate), CEQA and/or NEPA review will be required for many <br /> projects, and will help provide disclosure of potential impacts through evaluation of noise, air quality, <br /> hazards and other impacts if there is a change in operations associated with a lease or improvements). <br /> R124 A new Section 1.8 Environmental Review has been added to the document. <br /> C125 Comment: <br /> 4. The Policies are unclear about what notification is to be provided to the public or other interested <br /> parties (such as the City of Pleasanton), and at what stages in the process. As written, no public <br /> notification for any lease or improvement,beyond that required for a standard City Council or planning <br /> application(if required) is noted. While we do not think it will be necessary or appropriate to require a <br /> public notice for minor changes (e.g. repair of an existing building), certain actions or approvals, <br /> particularly those that would constitute an expansion or intensification of use, may warrant additional <br /> notification or referral. <br /> R125 See R4 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C126 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment. Please let me know if you have any questions or <br /> would like to discuss in more detail. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> R126 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Comment Compilation and Response 27 <br /> City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023) <br />