Laserfiche WebLink
L1VE1 ®RE <br /> " F° " " ' COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE <br /> C82 Section#2.1 <br /> Page# <br /> Comment: The City Initiative process should clearly state and reference the 2010 Livermore Resolution <br /> which indicates the terms for the initiative:"Future development at the airport shall only occur in response <br /> to existing aviation demand. Whether demand exists shall be evaluated by the airport advisory <br /> commission and shall be based on tangible evidence....""Redevelopment at the airport shall only occur <br /> if the Airport Advisory Commission determines that the existing facilities are in need of significant <br /> rehabilitation, improvement,or replacement"A City Initiative should NOT be(as in the draft document) <br /> -"if Airport land/improvements exist or become available"Information secrecy:All information must <br /> be provided publicly without NDA/confidential at all stages except for any financial information <br /> R82 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C83 Section#3.2 <br /> Page# <br /> Comment: ISSUE: There is no mention of Noise which is the major environmental quality issue facing <br /> the valley with the airport <br /> R83 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C84 Section#3.3 <br /> Page# <br /> Comment: This section introduces a number of NEW policies regarding land and improvements ISSUE: <br /> Does not have any policy regarding noise (including single noise events), adhering to the night time <br /> curfew, etc. Since new policies are possible (as indicated in this section), recommend the following <br /> policies:Mandatory yearly noise and flight path training for all FBOs,their leases,and occupants Signing <br /> of a"pledge"towards these noise/flight path guidelines <br /> R84 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Commenter#21 <br /> C85 Section# 1.2 <br /> Page#4 <br /> Comment:No mention of when/IF public notification/comment will happen.Public should be notified at <br /> every stage of the process (Interest, MOU, Concept Plan, etc.) and be able to provide feedback. All <br /> information must be provided publicly without NDA/Confidential at all stages of the process. <br /> R85 See R4 <br /> C86 Appendix City Initiatives: Leasing and Development Policy <br /> Page#25 <br /> Comment: Livermore letter: Point 5 - Noise impacts - ignored in this document and should be <br /> asked/addressed by any applicant.There should be new noise policies put in place. <br /> R86 See R5 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C87 Appendix Leasing and Development Policy <br /> Page#38-Section 7.7 Advertising Guidelines <br /> Comment: The City Initiative for RFI/RFP/RFQ is worded whenever there is "land/improvement <br /> available".This is in direct contradiction to the 2010 City resolution that explicitly indicates only when <br /> "existing demand" with "tangible evidence" (they cannot create demand), the city does not make this <br /> determination- it is the Airport Advisory Commission that does. <br /> R87 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Comment Compilation and Response 18 <br /> City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023) <br />