21 SUPPLEMENTAL - Laserfiche WebLink

LIVE ®RE CALIFORNIA COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE Commenter#3 C11 1)I am concerned and feel that All information must be provided publicly without NDN confidential at all stages except for any financial information RI I The Airport will engage in a transparent development process and will conduct outreach with the public throughout various phases of a particular project. The Airport Manager may recommend that the City enter into NDA agreements from time to time,in coordination with the City Manager's Office and other City departments. This decision will depend on the particular facts of a proposed project,which will vary with each project submittal to the Airport pursuant to the Development Policy. C12 2)Public notification/comment and airing if any proposals must happen Immediately. Rl2 See R4. Commenter#4 C13 General Comment: What are the noise limits for aircrafts operating within this airport and how would these noise limits be monitored and enforced? R 13 See R5 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. Commenter#5 C14 Honestly,I do not have the time to read and understand this draft I just want to go on record to say that I STRONGLY OPPOSE and expansion of the Livermore airport or any development not supporting it's current configuration, use,or capacity. LVK Is a small airport and should not be turned in to a larger, high volume airport. The current small planes are great, larger planes should not be allowed. Please consider the Livermore residents and do not negatively impact our quality of life. I do like the idea of offering an airplane mechanic course and partnering with las Positas College. Excellent idea, R14 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. Commenter#6 C15 Section#2.9 Page#7 Comment: Section 2.1 says that the City has the right to reject,without cause,any submittal.Fantastic! I loudly applaud this. However, Section 2.9 goes on to list the possible reasons for rejection. I suggest adding a preamble to 2.9 repeating that the City may reject without cause,but that the section contains a partial list of possible reasons.This disparity certainly requires clarification in Section 2.9 restating that the list need not be all-inclusive because the City can reject without cause. RI5 Grant Assurance 22, Economic Nondiscrimination, requires the City to make its aeronautical facilities available to the public and its tenants on terms that are reasonable and without unjust discrimination.This federal obligation involves several distinct requirements. First, the City must make the airport and its facilities available for public use.Next,the City must ensure that the terms imposed on aeronautical users of the Airport,including rates and charges,are reasonable for the facilities and services provided. Finally the terms must be applied without unjust discrimination.The prohibition on unjust discrimination extends to types,kinds and classes of aeronautical activities,as well as individual members of a class of operator. Within the forgoing context,the City will add the following language to Section 2.9.: The City at its sole discretion may reject any proposal or application in conformance with Legal Requirements including, but not limited to,for any one or more of the following reasons... Comment Compilation and Response 5 City of Livermore,Livermore Municipal Airport (06/05/2023)