My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
060623
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2023 4:48:54 PM
Creation date
5/31/2023 4:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
apply to the Housing Element re-zone sites. In HCD's second letter to the City on April <br /> 10, HCD is requesting further be done to address Policy 11 as a potential impediment to <br /> housing developments more generally (beyond the re-zone sites). As such, Program 4.8 <br /> has been further revised. <br /> Revisions to Program 4.8 would suspend General Plan Land Use Element Policy 11 <br /> beyond re-zone sites for residential development proposals on all properties with a <br /> mixed use, low- and medium-density General Plan land use designation. This <br /> suspension will allow projects with those designations to build to the maximum density <br /> permitted in the General Plan irrespective of having negotiated additional amenities or <br /> benefits with the city. Because Policy 11 ties such requests for density above the mid- <br /> point to a PUD process, this would mean such projects would not need to go through a <br /> PUD approval, unless it was required for other reasons (e.g., a project sought to deviate <br /> from development standards). <br /> Note that this change is consistent with the approach taken for the various Housing <br /> Element re-zone sites, which use conformance to objective design standards as the <br /> sole basis to determine if a project should be approved at its proposed density. And, in <br /> practical terms, given that the city is now largely built out, there are a limited number of <br /> other sites remaining in the city with potential and suitability for large scale <br /> development/ redevelopment, and for which there would have been the potential to <br /> negotiate significant additional public benefits which would be affected by this change. <br /> The City would still be able to negotiate amenities and benefits for projects not <br /> consistent with the General Plan and seeking General Plan or zoning map <br /> amendments, annexations, or developing as Planned Unit Developments, since such <br /> approvals remain discretionary. (Note that since the Planning Commission meeting <br /> further minor changes have been made to the text of Program 4.8 to clarify the intent of <br /> the program.) <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed these changes on May 10, 2023. While the <br /> Commission had several questions about the scope and rationale for proposed <br /> changes, particularly those for Program 4.8, the Commission did not suggest any <br /> additional changes to those proposed by staff. The Commission recommended the City <br /> Council adopt the amendments as proposed. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this item was published in The Valley Times and an email notification was sent <br /> to all interested parties who have signed up on the Housing Element website: <br /> Pleasanton housingelement.com. Staff has received no public comments at time of <br /> agenda report publication. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> The City prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) for the 6th <br /> Cycle Housing Element (SCH 2022040091), which was certified by the City Council on <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.