My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
051623
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2023 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
5/16/2023 11:51:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City of Pleasanton has historically met about 20% of its water supply needs through its <br /> groundwater pumping quota of 3,500 acre-feet per year. Due to PFAs contamination in its three wells, <br /> the City began the design of a PFAS Treatment and Wells Rehabilitation Project. On September 6, <br /> 2022, the City Council authorized staff to suspend the PFAS Treatment and Wells Rehabilitation <br /> Project, and to further evaluate water supply alternatives for the portion of water supply currently <br /> sourced via the City's groundwater. The need for the water supply alternatives evaluation was driven <br /> by increasing costs for PFAS treatment, regulatory uncertainty, and operational implications. Two <br /> categories of water supply alternatives would be considered: alternatives that continue to utilize the <br /> City's groundwater quota such as new City wells located in areas without PFAS, and alternatives that <br /> do not continue to utilize City' s groundwater quota such as purchasing 100 percent of pumping <br /> quota. <br /> The City and its consultant team have brainstormed a number of alternatives including some that <br /> could be done in partnership with Zone 7. These options would include a regional PFAs Treatment <br /> Facility (upsizing a Pleasanton facility to accommodate regional needs), additional wells in the Bernal <br /> subbasin and other such options. The Pleasanton team would like to work with Zone 7 to further <br /> explore these alternatives, and then evaluate them and the non-Zone 7 alternatives based on multiple <br /> criteria including cost, reliability, timeliness, and operational complexity. <br /> Staff recommends working with Pleasanton to explore such options. Staff recommends that... <br /> John Bauer <br /> South Pleasanton <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.