Laserfiche WebLink
Christina Casha <br /> From: Ellen Holmgren <br /> Sent: Thursday. Mav 11 �,n�,z 4:11 PM <br /> To: ,.payor and City Council <br /> Cc: �, ,I.com; Pamela Ott;Tamara Baptista; Daniel Repp; Pleasanton City <br /> Clerk <br /> Subject: Variable Water Rate being hiked 65-300% by the City: Public comment on City council <br /> Meeting May 16, 2023: Agenda Item #17 <br /> Attachments: Pleasanton Water Rates May 2022-City council.pdf <br /> Dear Vin Pohray, <br /> Thank you for your email and attachment regarding Item 17 on the City Council Regular Meeting Agenda on <br /> Tuesday, May 16, 2023. <br /> This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the Mayor and City Council, the City Manager, and City <br /> staff. <br /> Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Regards, <br /> Ellen Holmgren, Administrative Assistant <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Fronm- <br /> Sent:Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:52 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council<citycouncil@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Cc: Ellen Holmgren<eholmgren@cityofpleasantnnr•a anv-�• Rri;;n Dolan<bdolan@cityofpleasantonca.gov>; Pamela Ott <br /> <POtt@cityofpleasantonca.gov" _ .. .__»; Daniel Repp <br /> <drepp@cityofpleasantonca.gov>; Kathleen Yurchak<kyurchak@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Subject: Re:Variable Water Rate being hiked 65-300% by the City : Public comment on City council Meeting May 16, <br /> 2023:Agenda Item #17 <br /> ***[EXTERNAL]This message comes from an external organization.Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links,especially from unknown <br /> senders.*** <br /> Public comment on City council Meeting May 16, 2023: Agenda Item#17 <br /> Dear City Council <br /> Now that we are in the wettest rainfall year on record, when will be rid of drought rate surcharge and the significant <br /> revenue increase windfall, enjoyed by Pleasanton Water on our backs, during a horrible year of inflation. <br /> 1) 1 had pointed out the almost 100% increased revenue windfall that Pleasanton Water Department would have under the <br /> "drought rate" levy. <br /> PWD was reluctant to acknowledge the doubling of our charges being paid to them, as a 100% increase (attempting to <br /> characterize them as a few % increase) <br /> 1 <br />