My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
051623
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2023 3:37:06 PM
Creation date
5/10/2023 3:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> Consequently, since all parcels in the Maintenance District have good access and <br /> proximity to the Improvements and the benefits to relatively closer proximity are offset <br /> by other factors, additional proximity is not considered to be a factor in determining <br /> benefit within the Maintenance District. Therefore, zones of benefit are not justified or <br /> needed within the Maintenance District. <br /> Method of Assessment <br /> As previously discussed, the Assessments provide comprehensive Improvements that <br /> clearly confers direct and special benefits to properties in the Maintenance District. <br /> The allocation of special benefits to property is primarily based on the type of property <br /> and the size of property. These benefits can also partially be measured by the <br /> occupants on property in the Maintenance District because such parcel population <br /> density is a measure of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the Improvements. It <br /> should be noted that many other types of "traditional" assessments also use parcel <br /> population densities to apportion the assessments. For example, the assessments for <br /> sewer systems, roads and water systems are typically allocated based on the <br /> population density of the parcels assessed. Therefore, the apportionment of benefit is <br /> reasonably based on the type of parcel, the size of parcels and the population density of <br /> parcels. <br /> A critical step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit <br /> for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by <br /> each property in relation to a single-family home, or, in other words, on the basis of <br /> Single-Family Equivalent (SFE) units. This SFE methodology is commonly used to <br /> distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally <br /> recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. <br /> For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, all properties are designated an SFE value, <br /> which is each property's relative benefit in relation to a single-family home on one <br /> parcel. In this case, the "benchmark" property is the single family detached dwelling <br /> which is one Single Family Equivalent unit or one SFE. <br /> Finally, the special benefits to be derived from the Assessments will be conferred on <br /> property and are not based on a specific property owner's use of the Improvements, a <br /> specific property owner's occupancy of property, or the property owner's demographic <br /> status such as age or number of dependents. The benefits derived to property are <br /> related to the average number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or <br /> otherwise could occupy a property, not how the property is currently used by the <br /> present owner. Therefore, the number of people who could, or potentially, live on, work <br /> at, or otherwise occupy a property is one indicator of the relative level of benefit <br /> received by a property. <br /> In conclusion, the Assessment Engineer determined that the appropriate method of <br /> assessment apportionment should be based on the type of property, the relative size of <br /> the property, property location, its relative population, and its proximity to the <br /> landscaping and open space facilities. This method is further described below. <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Landscape Maintenance District No. 1993-1, Windsor Engineer's Report, Fiscal Year 2023-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.