My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
050223
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2023 8:24:24 AM
Creation date
4/26/2023 8:24:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IH[ CIIY OF <br /> 1 <br /> PLEASANTON, DRAFT 2023 Legislative Positions <br /> Bill #and Title Description Recommended TVC <br /> City Position Position/League <br /> Position <br /> (Wiener) includes, among other things, a housing element. Current law <br /> prohibits a local agency, as defined, from imposing a floor area ratio <br /> Housing standard that is less than 1.0 on a housing development project that <br /> development consists of 3 to 7 units, or less than 1.25 on a housing development <br /> project that consists of 8 to 10 units. Current law prohibits a local <br /> projects: floor area agency from imposing a lot coverage requirement that would <br /> ratios. physically preclude a housing development project of not more than <br /> 10 units from achieving the floor area ratios described above. This <br /> bill would delete the 10-unit maximum for eligible projects and <br /> would prohibit a local agency from imposing a floor area ratio <br /> standard that is less than 2.5 on a housing development project that <br /> consists of 11 to 20 units. The bill would prohibit a local agency <br /> from imposing a floor area ratio standard that is less than 1.25 for <br /> every ten housing units, rounded to the nearest ten units, on a <br /> housing development project that consists of more than 20 units. <br /> 15 SB 393 The California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as Support None/Watch <br /> (Glazer) defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the <br /> completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it <br /> California proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect <br /> Environmental on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that <br /> Quality Act: judicial the project will not have that effect. This bill would require a plaintiff <br /> or petitioner, in an action brought pursuant to the act, to disclose <br /> challenge: the identity of a person or entity that contributes in excess of <br /> identification of $1,000, as specified, toward the plaintiffs or petitioner's costs of the <br /> contributors: action. The bill also would require the plaintiff or petitioner to <br /> housing projects. identify any pecuniary or business interest related to the project of <br /> any person or entity that contributes in excess of$1,000 to the <br /> costs of the action, as specified. The bill would provide that a failure <br /> to comply with these requirements may be grounds for dismissal of <br /> the action by the court. <br /> 16 SB 405 Current law requires the Department of Housing and Community Oppose Pending/Watch <br /> Development to determine the existing and projected need for <br /> 8 � 1' age <br /> Updated 4.10.23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.