My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12142022
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
PC 12142022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2023 2:02:14 PM
Creation date
4/18/2023 2:00:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/14/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />3. P21-0751, 2023-2031 (6 th Cycle) Housing Element Update -Review of proposed modifications to <br />the Draft 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update and proposed rezoning sites <br />Chair Pace introduced and provided background information for the item. <br />Associate Planner Megan Campbell presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation for the <br />Commission's review including Housing Element Overview , update process ; proposed modifications <br />including Planned Unit Development (PUD) process and Residential Land Use controls and standards; <br />site selection; overview of RHNA; and staff's recommendation . <br />Chair Pace explained the State requirements and needs of the City and residents . <br />Commissioner Nibert asked about HCD 's comments and review process and danger of Housing <br />Element invalidation in light of a public comment. Director Clark stated the comment letter was <br />referencing the basis for sites inventory and justification for adequate capacity . She stated staff <br />believed the Housing Element was compliant with State law and could be certified . Commissioner <br />Nibert asked the process for City Council review . Community Development Director Clark stated the <br />Council was being asked to review the draft revised Housing Element and Planning Commission and <br />City Council changes would be incorporated . She discussed potential opportunities to increase the <br />minimum density for some sites and need to show a range of density on every site . Commissioner <br />Nibert discussed examples of higher density apartments in other jurisdictions . Director Clark explained <br />the current range was proposed at 45-75 and the Planning Commission could consider increasing the <br />range . Commissioner Nibert discussed Big Bear Lake 's Housing Element approval based on tying its <br />Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Plan to portions of the draft housing element. Community <br />Development Director Clark discussed the City 's inclusion of fair housing issues in the plan . Associate <br />Planner Campbell noted Appendix Fin the Draft Housing Element regarding AFFH . <br />Commissioner Morgan asked insights about assumed densities. Community Development Director <br />Clark stated the recommendations of the consultants were utilized . Jen Murillo , Lisa Wise Consulting , <br />explained standard approaches to assuming density for housing element site and efforts to approach <br />in the most conservative fashion. Commissioner Morgan inquired about sites with no expressed owner <br />interest. Community Development Director Clark discussed outreach efforts and lack of objection . <br />Associate Planner Campbell discussed owner notice of hearings . Commissioner Morgan asked if the <br />proposed modifications to PUD would limit the ability of master plans . Ms . Clark explained that <br />inclusion in the Housing Element conferred ability to build housing . She stated the State allowed for <br />more detailed planning for larger sites such as Stoneridge Mall and Kiewit. She anticipated in both <br />cases the owners would work with the City to develop a successful plan . <br />Commissioner Morgan asked if the intent was for projects to be self-parked . Community Development <br />Director Clark explained that the policy had been for properties to be self-parked but that the State <br />equated onsite parking with increased costs of construction . She discussed the need to find the right <br />balance and that in Pleasanton, most developers wanted to provide adequate parking . Commissioner <br />Morgan asked if the City was committed to meeting the standards related to level of service (LOS). <br />Traffic Engineer Tassano stated the goal was to continue to accommodate a minimum LOS D. He <br />explained the General Plan exemptions to meet needs . In response to Commissioner Morgan , Traffic <br />Engineer Tassano discussed the need to make adjustments to ensure viable projects such as <br />reducing industrial to accommodate housing on the Kiewit Site . <br />In response to Vice Chair Gaidos , Traffic Engineer Tassano provided information on the concerning <br />intersections and potential mitigation . He explained the need to modify building on Kiewit and at Santa <br />Rita and Valley to prevent the need for major mitigation . <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8 December 14, 2022
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.