My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 231376 Exhibit A - Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2023
>
RES 231376 Exhibit A - Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2023 9:05:52 AM
Creation date
4/5/2023 8:52:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/21/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1857
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />Introduction Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />4 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />1.4.1 - 15183 Findings: Proposed Project is Consistent with Existing Zoning and <br />Does Not Require Further Environmental Review <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 states that in instances where a project is consistent with a <br />community plan, general plan or zoning, if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, <br />has been addressed as a significant effect in the Prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the <br />imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards, then an additional EIR need not <br />be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact. This is consistent with the <br />fundamental CEQA policy favoring finality once an EIR is certified, and thus streamlines the review of <br />such projects and reduces the need to prepare repetitive environmental studies. <br />To evaluate the proposed project’s consistency with the checklist is to evaluate whether the <br />proposed project, which is consistent with the Housing Element, has any (1) “project-specific <br />significant effects that are peculiar to the project or its site,” (2) environmental effects that were “not <br />analyzed as significant effects” in the Prior EIR; (3) “potentially significant off-site impacts or <br />cumulative impacts which were not discussed” in the Prior EIR; or (4) environmental effects that <br />were “previously identified significant effects, which as a result of substantial new information . . . <br />are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the” Prior EIR. (CEQA <br />Guidelines § 15183 (b)(1)-(4)). <br />A supplemental environmental document need not be prepared for a project solely on the basis of <br />an impact that can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development <br />policies or standards. (CEQA Guidelines § 15183 (c)). An impact is not peculiar if uniformly applied <br />development standards or procedures are imposed with a finding that they will substantially <br />mitigate the applicable environmental impact. (CEQA Guidelines § 15183 (f)). Such uniformly <br />adopted policies or procedures do not have to be addressed in the Prior EIR or included in the <br />community plan or the general plan. (Id.) <br />In approving a project that is consistent under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the lead agency <br />appropriately limits its examination of environmental effects to those listed above. <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 applies to the proposed project since it meets all of the following <br />conditions. <br />15183(d)(1)(b) and (d)(1)(C): The project is consistent with the development density <br />established by general plan policies incorporated via the Zoning and Housing Element. <br />A project is consistent with established zoning and density if the project is the same or less than the <br />standard contemplated for the involved parcel(s) in the general plan for which an EIR has been <br />certified, and the project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan. (CEQA <br />Guidelines § 15183 (i)(2)). Density standards are expressed in various ways, including based on the <br />number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and <br />other measures of building intensity, building height, and size limitations and use restrictions. (State <br />of California, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research [OPR] General Plan Guidelines, 2003: 50.) <br />Density standards are also subject to density bonus laws which allow an exceedance of established <br />density by right.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.