My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_2023-02-22
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
04-12
>
_Minutes_2023-02-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2023 12:10:31 PM
Creation date
3/28/2023 12:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 February 22, 2023 <br />Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. PC-2023-6 and recommend City Council adoption of a <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) addendum and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />development plan for the application of Simon Property Group as filed under case No. PUD-136. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Eric Luchini presented the item. <br /> <br />Chair Pace opened the public hearing. The following individuals provided comment: Chuck Davis, <br />applicant; Jessica Music, applicant; Scott Travis, applicant; Michael Weddle <br /> <br />Chair Pace closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chair Pace opened the public hearing. The following individual provided comment: Scott Travis, <br />applicant <br /> <br />Chair Pace closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chair Pace opened the public hearing. The following individual provided comment: Cecily Barclay, <br />applicant <br /> <br />Chair Pace closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Jain/Pace to approve Item 3 as recommended, and request staff complete <br />additional analysis comparing project compliance against the current Objective Design Standards and <br />Stoneridge Mall Framework. The findings are to be provided to the Planning Commission and City <br />Council when the analysis is complete, but will not affect project approval. Motion passed by the <br />following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Commissioners Gaidos, Jain, Mohan, and Pace <br />Noes: Commissioner Morgan <br />Absent: None <br /> <br />Chair Pace recessed the meeting at 9:22 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:27 p.m. <br /> <br />4. Options for Virtual Meeting Attendance – Receive information regarding new California law for <br />limited virtual meeting attendance by Planning Commissioners which was adopted by the City. <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto presented the item. <br /> <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> <br />5. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> <br />Commissioner Jain reported attending a Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Traffic Committee meeting and noted <br />a proposal to build a bicycle path across Interstate 580. <br /> <br />6. Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />Director Ellen Clark provided a brief overview of the items listed in the report. <br /> <br />7. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />Planning Manager Melinda Denis provided a brief overview of the items listed in the report.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.