My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2023-06
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
PC-2023-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:39:19 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:25:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
parking lot within the existing urban area ; requiring higher residential and commercial densities in <br />the proximity of transportation corridors and hubs such as the nearby West Dublin Pleasanton <br />BART station ; assuring that new major commercial , office, and institutional centers are <br />adequately served by transit and by pedestrian and bicycle facilities; and encouraging new infill <br />housing to be developed and for the City to attain a variety of housing sizes , types , densities , <br />designs , and prices which meet the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of <br />the community with the Project providing studios to three-bedroom units and more than 16 <br />percent of the total units produced (24 percent of the base units , before density bonus) will be <br />affordable to low-income households. The Project environmental review determined that the <br />Project will present no new or more severe significant impacts , and no unstudied impacts that <br />are peculiar to the parcel. Therefore , it is recommended the City Council find the proposed <br />development plan is consistent with the City's General Plan, and this finding can be made . <br />Furthermore , the project would be consistent with all of the objective standards set forth in the <br />2012 Housing Design Standards and Guidelines , with the exception of two standards for which <br />waivers would be granted pursuant to State Housing Density Bonus Law . <br />3. Whether the plan is compatible with previously developed properties in the vicinity and <br />the natural, topographic features of the site: <br />The Project site is surrounded by a variety of uses : multi-story office buildings , a regional mall , <br />and residential development. The proposed residential use would be compatible with the <br />surrounding uses. The building and parking structure heights would be compatible with the multi- <br />story office buildings and parking structures in the vicinity , and with existing buildings at <br />Stoneridge Mall. The structures have been attractively designed and would be compatible with <br />the design of the surrounding structures . New landscaping would be installed to soften the <br />building and help screen parking areas from off-site views and provide buffers between <br />sidewalks and roadways , and the proposed project. The Project site is relatively level and has <br />been graded with prior development to accommodate existing parking lots and buildings . Except <br />for potential minor excavation and other minor grading to install landscap ing and to create proper <br />drainage for the improvements and bioswales , the existing grades on the Property would <br />generally be maintained. Grading conducted on the Property would be subject to engineering <br />and building standards prior to any development. Therefore, it is recommended the City Council <br />make this finding . <br />4. Whether grading takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br />keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding to have <br />as minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br />As described above , the Property is relatively level with minimum changes in grades proposed . <br />Erosion control and dust suppression measures would be documented in the building and <br />improvement plans and will be administered by the City 's Building and Engineering Divisions . <br />City building code requirements would ensure that building foundations , on-site driveways , and <br />parking areas are constructed on properly prepared surfaces . The proposed development would <br />provide adequate drainage to prevent flooding . Parking lot and roof drainage would drain into <br />landscaped bioretention areas that would filter contaminants before entering the arroyos and , <br />ultimately , the bay . The Property is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone . <br />The flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate the <br />Property is not located in a flood hazard zone . Therefore , it is recommended the City Council <br />make this finding .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.