My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
032123
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2023 4:41:23 PM
Creation date
3/20/2023 1:48:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/21/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PeRKINscoie <br /> Cecily Barclay <br /> March 21, 2023 <br /> Via E-Mail - pleasantoncityclerkCa)cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Mayor and Members of the City Council <br /> Gerry Beaudin, City Manager <br /> Pamela Ott, Deputy City Manager <br /> Ellen Clark, Community Development Director <br /> Daniel Sodergren, City Attorney <br /> c/o Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> 200 Old Bernal Ave, <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> Re: Stoneridge Residential Project- Council Hearing on March 21, 2023 (Item 13) <br /> Dear Mayor, Councilmembers, Mr. Beaudin, Ms. Ott, Ms. Clark, and Mr. Sodergren: <br /> We are writing on behalf of our client, Simon Property Group (SPG), regarding its Stoneridge <br /> Residential Project, which will be reviewed by the Council this evening (Item 13). <br /> SPG appreciates the significant efforts staff has made for us to be able to bring our project <br /> forward for your consideration and approval. Our team's collaboration with staff has resulted in <br /> what we believe is a model for the type of high-density development the Council will be seeking <br /> as the City builds out the housing proposed in its recently adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element. <br /> I am writing to ensure the Council is aware that this project is subject to several laws that limit its <br /> discretion. Specifically, SPG was concerned by suggestions by some Planning Commissioners <br /> that the project be modified to include a wider multi-use path along Stoneridge Mall Road, which <br /> cannot lawfully be required. Similarly, at least one Commissioner suggested shifting the <br /> apartment building as many as 15 feet north to make room for a wider path along the southern <br /> edge, which cannot be accomplished because it would require this residential building to extend <br /> beyond the boundary of the property the City has zoned to allow residential uses. <br /> There was also a request that the project be compared to the Objective Design Standards <br /> (ODS) and Framework Components the Council enacted on January 26, 2023, and some <br /> Commissioners suggested modifying the project to be consistent with those documents. As <br /> staff has consistently advised, these new standards do not apply to the project, and the City <br /> cannot lawfully require the project to conform to these inapplicable standards. <br /> For your reference, we attach an Addendum to this letter identifying and explaining how the <br /> provisions of certain housing and other laws support these conclusions. <br /> Perkins Cue LLP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.