My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 231366
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2023
>
RES 231366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2023 4:12:01 PM
Creation date
3/10/2023 4:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 1. Introduction | 16Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 <br />Engagement Themes <br />During engagement, several themes emerged as priorities for the community. These themes guided each stage of the planning process, ensuring that the <br />City developed policies that align with the community’s priorities. <br />Reliable Renewable Energy Water Conservation Sustainable Transportation <br />Residents support transitioning away from fossil <br />fuels to renewable energy sources, including <br />electrification and expanding local renewable energy <br />generation, particularly solar panels. Simultaneously, <br />the community is concerned about future blackouts <br />and energy shortages, underscoring the importance <br />of technologies like battery storage to ensure that <br />renewables are both a clean and reliable energy <br />source. <br />Community members recognize the threat that <br />severe droughts and water scarcity poses to <br />Pleasanton. They identified safe and clean water <br />as a priority early in the engagement process <br />and reiterated support throughout for water <br />conservation actions, such as expanding recycled <br />water systems. <br />Community members and City leaders alike highlighted the <br />need for adopting more policies and programs to reduce <br />GHG emissions from transportation, noting support for <br />electrifying transportation, expanding telecommuting, <br />incentivizing carpooling, making the city more bike- <br />and walk-friendly, making public transportation more <br />convenient, and using sustainable land use policy to reduce <br />VMT. <br />What we heard <br /> Â “Vacant or large open land like parking lots and <br />shopping centers are ideal for adding solar.” <br /> Â “Reliability of the grid; quality and cost (are critical).” <br />What we heard <br /> Â “We need to ensure that our water supply is safe <br />to drink and bathe in.” <br /> Â “Please put money into our water supply.” <br />What we heard <br /> Â “More specific targets focused on reducing VMT.” <br /> Â “Electrification across transportation and buildings <br />highest lever (for reducing emissions).” <br />Waste Reduction and Diversion Green Space and Carbon Storage Accessibility and Cost <br />Early on, community members elevated reducing <br />community waste as a top priority for CAP 2.0 and <br />reiterated this support throughout the engagement. <br />They noted the importance of both community reuse <br />programs to reduce waste overall and improving waste <br />diversion to divert unavoidable waste from landfills. <br />Community members emphasized the importance <br />of expanding green spaces and ensuring proper <br />soil management, both to support healthy habitat <br />and to increase local carbon sequestration. This <br />feedback resulted in focusing the Natural Systems <br />strategy on local carbon sequestration and <br />ecosystem resilience. <br />The community voiced concern over the cost and equity <br />implications of climate action, noting cost as a barrier to <br />climate action and highlighting the need to provide support <br />for low-income residents to ensure that implementing <br />CAP 2.0 does not inadvertently increase existing economic <br />disparities. Additionally, City staff reiterated throughout <br />the planning process that CAP 2.0 should focus on a short <br />list of highly impactful strategies and actions that are cost <br />effective and feasible to implement. <br />What we heard <br /> Â “REDUCE waste, then divert what is left.” <br /> Â “Stop the waste at source; businesses using <br />disposable everything!” <br /> Â “City events and programs need to focus on food <br />recycling/composting.” <br />What we heard <br /> Â “How could Pleasanton offset emissions with <br />low-cost investments in carbon sequestration <br />projects?” <br /> Â “Community gardens would be great!” <br /> Â “More trees in parks & on streets will clean the <br />air and provide more shade from the heat.” <br />What we heard <br /> Â “I am concerned about the rising cost of living in <br />Pleasanton as a result of the plan.” <br /> Â “Need to consider cost associated (with energy efficiency <br />retrofits); need to incentivize.” <br /> Â “What are the equity/cost implications of EBCE’s <br />Renewable 100?”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.