Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />Summary of Agenda Report Attachments <br /> <br />Attachment 1: Staff Recommended Funding Allocation - This spreadsheet is intended <br />as a starting point for the commission to provide funding recommendations to City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Attachment 2: ZoomGrants Scoring Report - This document shows the composite <br />rankings from the commission’s review. Commissioners individually evaluated the 22 <br />applications that were assigned to the Human Services Commission. <br /> <br />Attachment 3: Human Services Commission Evaluation Criteria – This document is <br />reviewed and approved annually by the commission, with the purpose of assisting their <br />evaluation process. <br /> <br />Attachment 4: Human Services Commission Statement of Priorities – This document is <br />reviewed and approved annually by the commission, with the purpose of keeping the <br />commission focused on Pleasanton specific priority needs and service delivery. <br /> <br />Summary of HHSG Applications <br />The applications received are of high quality, target a wide range of community needs, <br />and demonstrate the broad scope of services provided to the community. Summary <br />observations: <br /> <br />• 30 applications received <br />• Total funding requested = $1,355,639 <br />• Five new human services programs/projects, highlighted in red on Attachment 1, <br />were submitted this year: <br />o Axis Community Health / Triage Nurse <br />o Hively / Workforce Development – Additional Childcare Spaces <br />o Partners for Change / Education and Mentorship Program for Poverty Alleviation <br />o Tri-Valley Haven / Shiloh Rebuild Project <br />o Wishing Well / No One Should Sleep Hungry. <br /> <br />Several agencies submitted multiple applications. Agencies submitting multiple <br />applications were asked to rank them in order of agency priority for funding, and when <br />appropriate, staff considered the preferred prioritization in developing its <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />Staff’s funding recommendations are provided in Attachment 1. As in prior years, staff <br />will adjust the recommendations at the meeting to assist the commission in developing <br />its funding recommendation. The recommendation is scaled to the funds available in <br />each of the funding source categories: CDBG, City General Fund, HOME, and LIHF. <br /> <br />Projects are separated by those that are identified for review and recommended by <br />each commission (Human Services and Housing). Attachment 1 includes several