Laserfiche WebLink
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> 12956 <br />DUDEK 58 April 2022 <br />Table 3.8-1. Estimated Annual Construction GHG Emissions <br />Construction Year <br />CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e <br />Metric Tons <br />Year 1 63.44 0.02 0.00 63.88 <br />BAAQMD Threshold 1,100 <br />Threshold Exceeded? No <br />Source: Appendix B <br />Notes: CO2 = carbonp dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrous oxide; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent; <br />Operations. The project would involve construction of a mountain bike trail. There would be no <br />energy consumed at the project site and thus the project would not generate any GHG emissions <br />other than from vehicle travel to and from the site. The proposed trail would replace an existing <br />unofficial, user-created trail. The user-created trail is already subject to moderate usage. Once the <br />proposed trail is completed, it is expected that there would be a slight increase in trail usage, which <br />would create a minor number of new vehicle trips. As a local-serving recreation facility that would <br />enhance the recreational opportunities already present at the Augustin Bernal Community Park, <br />the project would not generate substantial increases in vehicle-miles-traveled in the project area. <br />Thus, the project would not cause a long-term increase in GHG emissions. <br />In summary, the combined GHG emissions associated with project construction and operations <br />would be well below BAAQMD’s GHG threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, the project <br />would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact <br />on the environment, and this would represent a less-than-significant GHG impact. <br />b) Would the project generate conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the <br />purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? <br />The City of Pleasanton’s current Climate Action Plan (CAP), adopted in 2012, includes GHG <br />emissions baseline, future projections, and reduction targets, GHG reduction goals, strategies, <br />and supporting actions for a variety of sectors, recommended actions for preparing for climate <br />change with climate adaptation measures, and a monitoring and implementation strategy (City <br />of Pleasanton 2012). The proposed project would comply with the applicable measures outlined <br />in the CAP, including creating and maintaining a safe, convenient, and effective system that <br />encourages increased bicycle use. <br />The Scoping Plan, approved by CARB on December 12, 2008, provides a framework for actions <br />to reduce California’s GHG emissions and requires CARB and other state agencies to adopt <br />regulations and other initiatives to reduce GHGs. As such, the Scoping Plan is not directly <br />applicable to specific projects. Relatedly, in the Final Statement of Reasons for the Amendments <br />to the CEQA Guidelines, the California Natural Resources Agency observed that “[t]he [Scoping <br />Plan] may not be appropriate for use in determining the significance of individual projects <br />because it is conceptual at this stage and relies on the future development of regulations to <br />implement the strategies identified in the Scoping Plan (CARB 2014).”Under the Scoping Plan, <br />however, there are several state regulatory measures aimed at the identification and reduction <br />of GHG emissions. CARB and other state agencies have adopted many of the measures identified