Laserfiche WebLink
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> 12956 <br />DUDEK 51 April 2022 <br />population because access to the park is limited to City residents or individuals who obtain a permit <br />from the City. Thus, the increased usage of the park would not generate a substantial increase in <br />petroleum consumption. Additionally, energy used from vehicles traveling to and from the project <br />site would decrease over time as vehicles become increasingly efficient in accordance with the <br />energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction standards. As such, energy use from project <br />operations would be less than significant. <br />b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy <br />efficiency? <br />The project would follow applicable energy standards and regulations during the construction <br />phases. Project operation would not require use of electricity or natural gas, and the increase in <br />petroleum usage by trail users would not be substantial. All visitor vehicles and , maintenance <br />equipment would be subject to all applicable regulations that implement state and local plans for <br />renewable energy and efficiency. As such, the project would result in no impact from conflict with <br />or obstruction of a state or local plan for renewable energy and energy efficiency. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No mitigation measures are required. <br />3.7 Geology and Soils <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact No Impact <br />VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential <br />substantial adverse effects, including <br />the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br /> <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist- <br />Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map <br />issued by the State Geologist for the <br />area or based on other substantial <br />evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42. <br /> <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, <br />including liquefaction? <br />iv) Landslides? <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil?