My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 2:21:14 PM
Creation date
2/17/2023 2:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />64 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />Embarcadero Court, Stoneridge Mall Road and Mc Williams Lane, Stoneridge Mall Road and 5526 <br />Springdale Avenue) that serve Bus Route 3 and 53, all located within 1,000 feet of the project site, <br />which would encourage future residents and employees at the project site to use the transit, <br />pedestrian, and bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the proposed project. Additionally, as shown in <br />Table 2 above, the proposed project would incorporate several 2017 Clean Air Plan control measures <br />as project design features, such as complying with energy efficiency standards contained in the <br />current version of the California Building Standards Code (CBC) and maintaining landscaping across <br />the project site. Considering this information, the proposed project would not disrupt or hinder the <br />implementation of any AQP control measures. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with <br />Criterion 3. <br />Summary <br />As analyzed above, the proposed project would be consistent with all three criteria. Thus, the <br />proposed project would not conflict with the 2017 Clean Air Plan and would be consistent with the <br />conclusions of the Prior EIR. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the <br />proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be <br />less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse <br />impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />b) Cumulative Increase of Criteria Pollutants <br />Summary of the Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR found that implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Rezonings would <br />result in increased long-term emissions of criteria pollutants associated with construction activities <br />that could contribute substantially to an air quality violation. However, implementation of Prior EIR <br />MM 4.B-1a would ensure that impacts from emissions such as fugitive dust and other emissions <br />would be less than significant. Therefore, the analysis identified that this impact would be less than <br />significant with mitigation implementation. <br />Analysis of Proposed Project <br />The Prior EIR includes 400 dwelling units built within the Stoneridge Mall. The proposed project <br />includes 360 dwelling units. Therefore, the proposed project’s criteria pollutant emissions were <br />accounted for in the Prior EIR. The following analysis is provided to demonstrate consistency with <br />the impact findings included in the Prior EIR. <br />This impact is related to the cumulative effect of a proposed project’s regional criteria pollutant <br />emissions. By its nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact resulting from emissions <br />generated over a large geographic region. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result <br />of past and present development within the San Francisco Bay Air Basin (Air Basin), and this regional <br />impact is a cumulative impact. Therefore, new development projects (such as the proposed project) <br />within the Air Basin would contribute to this impact only on a cumulative basis. No single project <br />would be sufficient in size, by itself, to result in nonattainment of regional air quality standards. <br />Instead, a project’s emissions may be individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, when <br />evaluated in combination with past, present, and future development projects.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.