3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum 56 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx Neither the PUD–Mixed -Use land use designation nor zoning district allow for agricultural uses. There are no active agricultural uses at the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use. Additionally, the project site is not identified as having a Williamson Act Contract.26 Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. The proposed project would not result in any impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Because there would be no impacts, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. c, d) Forest Zoning and Conversion of Forest Land Prior EIR Conclusions As discussed above, the Prior EIR found that most of the City is located on developed urban land. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning maps designate the project site as PUD – Mixed-Use, which does not allow for forest or agricultural uses. Therefore, the Prior EIR concluded that there would be no significant impact on forest resources. Analysis of Proposed Project As previously discussed, the project site is zoned as PUD – Mixed -Use, which does not allow for forestry or timberland production. This precludes the proposed project from conflicting with zoning for forest land or timberland or resulting in the loss of forest land. Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. The proposed project would not result in any impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Because there would be no impacts, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. d) Pressures to Convert Farmland or Forest Land Prior EIR Conclusions As discussed above, the Prior EIR found that most of the City is located on developed urban land. In addition, the Prior EIR found that the Housing Element would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use, or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Therefore, the Prior EIR concluded that there would be no significant impact on farmland and forest land. 26 City of Pleasanton. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 7-6 Farmland and Williamson Act Lands. July 21.