My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 2:21:14 PM
Creation date
2/17/2023 2:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 49 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with <br />the findings in the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information <br />that would cause new or more severe impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />b) State Scenic Highway <br />Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR indicated that Site 3 is not visible from I-680. The Prior EIR also indicated that Site 3 is <br />within full or partial view of I-580 but there are no scenic resources on Site 3. The project site is only <br />a portion of Site 3 and cannot be seen from I-580 due to intervening development and vegetation. <br />The Prior EIR stated that the proposed changes to land use designations for Site 3 would not <br />intensify planned development, as Site 3 was already designated and planned for commercial and <br />office development, which would result in a similar intensity of development as the proposed high- <br />density residential uses. As such, the Prior EIR concluded that sites considered for residential <br />development—including Site 3—would not result in substantial damage to scenic resources, and <br />therefore impacts to State Scenic Highways would be less than significant. <br />Analysis of Proposed Project <br />The project site consists of a parking lot and there are no scenic resources on-site. The project site is <br />not visible from I-680 or I-580 because of distance and intervening developed land uses, and <br />therefore would not introduce any new impacts to views from State Scenic Highways not previously <br />disclosed. Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary, <br />consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new <br />information that would cause new or more severe impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />c) Visual Character <br />Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR considered the project’s impacts in relation to a previous version of the Appendix G <br />Checklist question: Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of <br />the site and its surroundings?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.