3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist FirstCarbon Solutions 49 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the findings in the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. b) State Scenic Highway Prior EIR Conclusions The Prior EIR indicated that Site 3 is not visible from I-680. The Prior EIR also indicated that Site 3 is within full or partial view of I-580 but there are no scenic resources on Site 3. The project site is only a portion of Site 3 and cannot be seen from I-580 due to intervening development and vegetation. The Prior EIR stated that the proposed changes to land use designations for Site 3 would not intensify planned development, as Site 3 was already designated and planned for commercial and office development, which would result in a similar intensity of development as the proposed high- density residential uses. As such, the Prior EIR concluded that sites considered for residential development—including Site 3—would not result in substantial damage to scenic resources, and therefore impacts to State Scenic Highways would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project The project site consists of a parking lot and there are no scenic resources on-site. The project site is not visible from I-680 or I-580 because of distance and intervening developed land uses, and therefore would not introduce any new impacts to views from State Scenic Highways not previously disclosed. Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. c) Visual Character Prior EIR Conclusions The Prior EIR considered the project’s impacts in relation to a previous version of the Appendix G Checklist question: Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?