3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum 140 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist Addendum_Updated.docx for the production of cement, asphalt, plaster sand, and fill. The Prior EIR found that there would not be a loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State, or a loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, the Prior EIR concluded that there would be no impact on mineral resources. Analysis of Proposed Project As described above, the project site is partially located in an MRZ-3 zone, meaning that part of the project site may contain mineral resources of unknown value.76 However, the project site is currently developed with a parking lot and is not undergoing mining activities. In addition, the development of mining operations is not permitted under the PUD-Mixed-Use zoning, as stated under the Pleasanton Municipal Code Chapter 18.44, Commercial Districts.77 There would continue to be no impact, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe impacts. Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on which the proposed project would be located. There is no new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the Prior EIR. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Conclusion There is no additional information identifying new significant effects, nor is there an increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to mineral resources. The conclusions from the Prior EIR regarding mineral resources remain unchanged. No further analysis is required. The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the certified Prior EIR and would not result in any impacts related to mineral resources. Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively. Further environmental analysis is not required because: • No impacts have been identified as a result of the proposed project or its site. • There are no potentially significant impacts that were not analyzed as significant in the Prior EIR. 76 California Geological Survey. 2015. CGS Information Warehouse – Mineral land Classification. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc. Accessed November 7, 2022. 77 City of Pleasanton. 2021. Pleasanton Municipal Code – 18.44.080 Permitted and Conditional Uses. Website: https://library.qcode.us/lib/pleasanton_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_18-chapter_18_44-18_44_080. Accessed November 7, 2022.