My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 2:21:14 PM
Creation date
2/17/2023 2:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 99 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />Adherence to the soil and foundation support parameters in Chapters 16, and 18 of the CBC and the <br />grading requirements in Chapter 18 of the CBC, as required by City and State law, would further <br />ensure the maximum practicable protection available from ground failure under static or dynamic <br />conditions for structures and their associated trenches, temporary slopes and foundations. <br />Additionally, as part of the City’s standard practice, the proposed project would be required to <br />adhere to seismic design standards and General Plan Goal 2, Policy 5, which the General Plan <br />concluded would be sufficient to reduce impacts to less than significant. Impacts would continue to <br />be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with the Prior EIR. There are no <br />proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would cause new or more severe <br />impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />iv) Landslides <br />Prior EIR Conclusions <br />The Prior EIR found that the City is in a relatively flat valley surrounded by hills that are subject to <br />landslide hazards. However, the Prior EIR found that the proposed rezoning sites under the Housing <br />Element would not expose people or structures on to landslides or mudflows. Additionally, it was <br />determined that adherence to the foundation support parameters in Chapters 16 and 18 of the CBC <br />and grading requirements therein, in addition to the Pleasanton Municipal Code, would ensure that <br />future development and associated trenches, temporary slopes, and foundations would minimize <br />potential landslide hazards. Therefore, the Prior EIR found that potential impact of landslides or <br />mudflows would be less than significant. <br />Analysis of Proposed Project <br />As described above, none of the sites evaluated by the Prior EIR, including the project site, contain <br />landslide risks. No changes have occurred to the project site that would alter this conclusion. <br />Impacts would continue to be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary, consistent with <br />the Prior EIR. There are no proposed changes, new circumstances, or new information that would <br />cause new or more severe impacts. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.