Laserfiche WebLink
2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 2.0 Land Use Element <br />2-19 Adopted 07 21 09 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The General Plan provides for the varied housing needs of people <br />who live and work in the community by designating a wide range <br />of residential densities and adopting policies aimed at all economic <br />segments of the community. The designation of high- density <br />residential and mixed-use land within and adjacent to business parks <br />is a notable example of the City’s efforts. <br />Pleasanton also provides jobs for people who choose to live within <br />other communities. The designation of land for business parks in <br />locations convenient to freeways, arterials, and transit corridors in <br />North Pleasanton is a good example. <br />The City also provides a wide range of housing opportunities for <br />people who choose to commute out of Pleasanton to work. The wide <br />range of housing types and prices provided by the City’s distribution <br />of Rural-, Low-, Medium-, and High-Density housing is a notable <br />example. The City’s policies to maintain its proportion of high- <br />density housing and percentage of rental units and to encourage <br />affordable housing through its Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance and <br />Growth Management Program are examples of the City’s efforts to <br />help meet the affordable housing needs of workers in Pleasanton, the <br />Tri-Valley, and farther away locations. Pleasanton’s strategy to <br />provide housing and employment opportunities to meet the full <br />range of commute behavior is the key to ensuring a functional <br />distribution of jobs and housing in the Tri-Valley area. <br />Pleasanton has played an active part in subregional committees such <br />as the Triangle Study (looking at impacts of congestion and road <br />improvements on I-680, I-580 and State Route 84), and Association <br />of Bay Area Government (ABAG) forums addressing land use and <br />transportation issues. The goals, policies, and programs contained <br />throughout the General Plan address the City’s role in cooperating <br />with other jurisdictions to provide for a functional distribution of <br />jobs and housing within the Tri-Valley while allowing the city to <br />develop into the type of community desired by its citizens. <br />Annexation <br />The City of Pleasanton encompasses approximately 24 square miles. <br />Unincorporated pockets within or adjacent to the City include: the <br />Remen Tract, consisting of 22 acres around Vine Street, Linden Way <br />and Virginia Way, mostly semi-rural residential development; <br />Castlewood Country Club, a 224-acre, hillside residential subdivision <br />largely developed in the 1950s through 1980s and including the private <br />Castlewood Country Club <br />golf course, pool, and tennis <br />facilities; the 46-acre Merritt <br />property located on the east <br />side of Foothill Road, south <br />of Foothill High School; land <br />on the west side of Foothill <br />Road in the vicinity of Santos <br />Ranch Road; and the 124- <br />acre undeveloped Staples <br />Ranch Areas west of El <br />Charro Road at I-580, and <br />parts of Happy Valley. In <br />addition to these properties, <br />there are also large areas to <br />the west, south, and east of <br />the City which are outside Centex homes under construction <br />City limits and within the <br />City’s Sphere of Influence and Planning Area. The annexation of <br />remaining contiguous parcels of unincorprated County land to the <br />City is crucial to completing an efficient system of municipal services <br />at General Plan buildout. The following criteria should be followed <br />for evaluating future annexation proposals: <br />1. Public agencies should be capable of providing adequate or <br />expandable services such as water, sewer, police, fire, <br />transportation, solid-waste disposal, parks, and schools to the