Laserfiche WebLink
Megan Campbell <br />December 5, 2022 <br />Page 6 <br />SEIP-58196\2713340.1 <br />In summary, Seefried is confident that development of the Kiewit Project would <br />incorporate several VMT reduction measures that would significantly reduce the <br />Kiewit Project’s potential VMT impacts.10 Because it is unclear whether Alternative <br />Two would result in any actual reduction in VMT impacts and it would significantly <br />reduce the HEU’s effectiveness in meeting its objectives, it should be rejected. <br />******************************************************* <br />We hope the above information is helpful to you. Seefried and its development <br />team look forward to continuing to work cooperatively with the City and the broader <br />community to facilitate the City’s adoption of a legally compliant HEU that is based <br />on a robust and legally defensible EIR. In so doing, Seefried, as a major <br />stakeholder, is eager to collaborate with the City to help deliver on its commitment <br />set forth in its HEU to satisfy its RHNA obligations by facilitating the expeditious and <br />efficient delivery of several hundred high-quality homes affordable to a range of <br />income levels within a thoughtfully-designed residential community, which will <br />greatly benefit the City and its residents at an optimal location. Should you have <br />any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. <br />Sincerely, <br />MILLER STARR REGALIA <br />Bryan W. Wenter <br />Bryan W. Wenter, AICP <br />BWW:tzb <br />10 When considering these efforts and the crucial role the Kiewit Site will play in meeting the <br />HEU project objectives and given the questionable reduction in VMT, we believe there is not <br />support in the administrative record for the City to adopt Alternative Two identified in the <br />DEIR. <br />6(()5,(' <br />3DJHRI <br /> <br />&217