3_Exhibit A - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2023-06 Page Two Section 1. Finds it has independently reviewed and analyzed the Addendum and other information in the record, including the EIR as supplemented by the SEIR, and has considered the information contained therein, prior to recommending approval of the Project; the Addendum has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and the Addendum represents the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Pleasanton as lead agency for the Project. Section 2. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council make the following findings for adoption of the Addendum based upon the entire record of proceedings before it and all information received that: 1. The conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and 15162 have not occurred and the Commission finds that the previously prepared EIR and SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and are adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for the Project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; and 2. The Addendum concluded the implementation of the Project would not result in any new or more significant impacts to the environment, or result in any unstudied significant impacts that are peculiar to the parcel; and 3. There is no substantial evidence the Project will have a new or more severe significant effect on the environment, or result in any unstudied significant impacts that are peculiar to the parcel and recommends the City Council adopt the Addendum and incorporate its conclusions and reasoning by reference. The Addendum is: (1) on file in the Planning Division located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton, California 94566; and (2) available for inspection by any interested person/party. Section 3. Recommends the following findings for approval of Case No. PUD-136: With respect to the Case No. PUD-136, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council make the following findings and determinations with respect to each of the considerations for a PUD Development Plan as required by Section 18.68.110 of the PMC: 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare: The Project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The Project would include the installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems to serve the new development. With the recommended traffic mitigations, the Project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. Adequate access would be provided to the structures for police, fire, and other emergency response vehicles. Stormwater run-off from the site will be treated before leaving the site. Construction hour limits and dust suppression requirements w ould minimize construction impacts on the surrounding residents and tenants. The Project is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area . Therefore, it is recommended the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and this finding can be made.