My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
121522
>
01 SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 4:10:07 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 4:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
01
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\121522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br /> ATTACHMENT C <br /> Stoneridge Mall Frame\Nork <br /> pLE ASANTONC Public Comments <br /> From:
[email protected]
<br /> Sent:Tuesday,September 27, 2022 11:23 AM <br /> To:Shweta Bonn<
[email protected]
> <br /> Subject: RE:Stoneridge Mall Project Follow-Up <br /> Shweta, <br /> Thank you for sending the PowerPoint. My thoughts on the Framework are as follows. <br /> From what I learned at the meeting it appears that for multiple reasons a good portion of the mall will <br /> remain, although it may be reconfigured to various extents depending on the overall framework for the <br /> project. So many of the key decisions to be made are regarding the environment surrounding the mall <br /> that may encompass additional housing, retail,theatre(s), restaurants,gyms/recreation,etc. One of the <br /> things which makes Pleasanton uniquely great is the current downtown area,so I agree with the <br /> statement made in the meeting that whatever is done the environment should complement the <br /> downtown feeling to preserve and extend that which is so special about Pleasanton. <br /> Of the five choices featured in the"Elements to Include as Mall Transforms" my thinking is that although <br /> green is good Pleasanton already has a great assortment of parks,along with an increasing number of <br /> bicycle paths. Additional indoor mall space doesn't make sense given the increasing trends toward non- <br /> brick and mortar, and we already have a restaurant/shopping oriented main street. <br /> Therefore my preference is for the pedestrian-oriented plaza, but executed in way that, as mentioned <br /> above,would uniquely extend the good feeling people have about downtown. My thought is to have a <br /> walking-friendly, open,attractive and vehicle-free"hanging out" area with a selection of unique retail, <br /> gallery and restaurant options where people could spend a few hours because,other than downtown on <br /> no-traffic weekends,there isn't anything else like that in our area. It can even include a bandstand <br /> similar to what we have ay Wayside Park. To balance downtown's old school aura it should have a <br /> "warm-tech" (rather the City Center Bishop Ranch "high-tech") approach that incorporates a newer feel <br /> but still has a friendly,approachable ambience. <br /> I don't have a specific example around here, but the Phoenix/Scottsdale or Santa Fe areas come to mind <br /> as regions with many destination spots that embody a blend of the old with the new. <br /> That's the extent of my thinking thus far, so I'd appreciate it if you could share these thoughts and build <br /> them into the feedback summary coming out of last night's meeting. <br /> Thank you, <br /> - Jeff <br /> From: Shweta Bonn<
[email protected]
> <br /> Sent:Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:38 AM <br /> To:
[email protected]
<br /> Subject: RE:Stoneridge Mall Project Follow-Up <br /> Good morning, Jeff, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.