My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
02 ATTACHMENT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:26:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
02
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing Element Community Survey Summary <br />7 <br />2.2.2 Prioritize Areas for Additional Housing <br />Survey Questions 5 and 6: As part of the Housing Element Update, the City will <br />need to identify additional areas where housing can be accommodated in Pleasanton. <br />Please prioritize the following areas where you think it would be most appropriate <br />to allow for additional housing in Pleasanton. 1=Greatest Priority; 8=Least Priority <br />Answered: 615 Skipped: 7 <br /> <br />This survey question asked respondents to rank a series of eight suggested areas that may be suitable <br />to accommodate additional housing, with 1 = greatest priority to 8 = least priority. Respondents <br />could also indicate an “Other” option and provide an open-ended response. In the scoring for this <br />response, based on the average ranking assigned by participants, a lower numeric value will equal a <br />higher priority and vice-versa.1 <br /> <br />The following charts indicate the average score for each response, as well as the distribution of <br />ranking choices for each response, which provides more detail of the composition of the average <br />scores. <br /> <br />Overall, the survey respondents ranked on average, as their highest priority, sites for new housing <br />that have been identified as underutilized commercial areas, such as older shopping centers (this <br />response received an average score of 2.51). Respondents also indicated that when choosing housing <br />sites, locating sites near transit is a high priority (average score of 2.90), followed by sites that were <br />part of mixed-use developments (average score 3.50), or along major streets (average score 4.47). <br />The lowest ranked options for new housing included sites within the downtown (5.33), and through <br />the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units (average score 5.36). Placing new housing sites within <br />existing neighborhoods was the lowest-ranked preference, scoring an average of 5.43. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 The survey randomized the order in which the various responses were listed, in an effort to minimize position bias. <br />Public Participation Summaries City of Pleasanton | E-67
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.