My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02 ATTACHMENT 1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
02 ATTACHMENT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
02
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />Responses to Written Comments Final EIR <br /> <br /> <br />2-50 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480022 Sec02-00 Responses to Written Comments_TRACKS.docx <br />Housing Element Update, and then further refined. Considerations of feasibility of redevelopment, <br />neighborhood compatibility, and support expressed by the community were all accounted for in <br />developing this alternative, thus refining the rankings included in the initial selection criteria <br />evaluation. <br />Response to CALIFORNIA GOLD-4 <br />The commenter states that Site 18 (Valley Plaza) is in an ideal location at an ideal time and reduces <br />Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and offers reduced water usage, while helping the City to meet its <br />housing needs. <br />The comment does not specifically address the adequacy of the Draft Program EIR or identify any <br />potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The comment is noted and will be provided to <br />City decision-makers. <br />Response to CALIFORNIA GOLD-5 <br />This comment is a reproduction of Chapter 6, Alternatives to the Proposed Project, of the Draft <br />Program EIR. It is included in this comment letter as Attachment A. <br />Response to CALIFORNIA GOLD-6 <br />This comment is a draft plan for Valley Plaza. It is included in this comment letter as Attachment B. <br />Response to CALIFORNIA GOLD-7 <br />This comment is a reproduction of the City’s Site Scoring included as part of the City’s preliminary <br />sites inventory. It is included in this comment letter as Attachment C.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.