Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />104 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (Draft Program EIR, Page <br />3.8-31). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />Housing Element Update which avoid or substantially lessen the significant <br />environmental effects as identified in the Program EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, § <br />15091(a)(1)) <br />Mitigation Measures <br />MM HAZ-2 Environmental Site Assessment <br />If a potential site for rezoning is suspected to contain hazardous materials, prior to <br />building permits, the City shall ensure that each project applicant retain a qualified <br />environmental consulting firm to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br />(Phase I ESA) in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials <br />(ASTM) Standards in effect at the time of request of issuance of grading or building <br />permits, whichever is sooner, which would ensure the City is aware of any hazardous <br />materials on-site. The Phase I ESA shall determine the presence of recognized <br />environmental conditions and state whether further investigation is recommended <br />(e.g., preparation of a Phase II ESA, if applicable). Prior to receiving a certificate of <br />occupancy, project applicants shall provide documentation from any overseeing <br />agency (e.g., Alameda County Environmental Health [ACEH], Department of Toxic <br />Substances Control [DTSC] or Regional Water Quality Control Board) to the <br />Community Development Department, Planning Division that sites with identified <br />contamination have been remediated to levels where no threat to human health or <br />the environmental remains for the proposed uses. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: Future construction activities would have the potential to release <br />potentially hazardous soils- and groundwater-based materials into the environment during site <br />grading and excavation operations. However, development of the potential sites for rezoning is not <br />expected to result in the transport, use, storage, or disposal of substantial amounts of hazardous <br />materials, with the exception of common residential and commercial-grade hazardous materials <br />such as household cleaners and paint, among others. Several documented release sites are within <br />0.5 mile of the potential sites for rezoning. In addition, DTSC notes that Site 22 (Merritt) is a currently <br />inactive DTSC site but needs further evaluation regarding previously detected volatile organic <br />chemicals (VOCs) and organochlorine pesticides in soil and groundwater. Construction activities at <br />these sites would likely involve ground-disturbing activities that could expose workers, the public, <br />and the environment to contaminated soil and groundwater, if present. To prevent and minimize <br />hazardous condition to below a level of significance, existing local, State, and federal law, including <br />those listed under Section 3.8.3 Regulatory Framework, would be enforced at all construction sites. <br />Future projects would comply with Cal/OSHA regulations concerning the use of hazardous materials. <br />All contaminated waste must be collected and disposed of at an appropriately licensed disposal or <br />treatment facility. <br />Future development (including redevelopment of existing developed sites) must comply with the <br />California Code or Regulations. Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations establishes Cal/OSHA <br />requirements related to public and worker protection. Construction safety and exposure standards