Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 99 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Draft <br />Program EIR, Page 3.3-26). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (Draft Program EIR, Page <br />3.3-27). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />Housing Element Update which avoid or substantially lessen the significant <br />environmental effects as identified in the Program EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, § <br />15091(a)(1)) <br />Mitigation Measures <br />Implement MM BIO-1. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Planning Area is likely to contain sensitive communities (e.g., oak <br />woodlands and riparian habitat), and Site 1 (Lester) may contain undisturbed oak woodland habitat. <br />This community has the potential to provide habitat for many special-status species. Development <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update could result in direct or indirect effects on riparian <br />habitat and other sensitive communities because of project construction. Activities that would divert <br />or obstruct the natural flow or change the bed, channel, or bank of any lake or stream, would be <br />required to obtain a “Streambed Alteration Agreement” from the CDFW prior to any alteration of a <br />lakebed, stream channel, or their banks. The General Plan includes goals, policies, and programs <br />designated to protect riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities by concentrating <br />development in previously disturbed areas and by emphasizing avoidance, minimization, and <br />mitigation of impacts through development guidelines and standards. Chapter 7, Conservation and <br />Open Space Element of the General Plan, Policies 1 and 3 of Goal 2 call for the preservation and <br />enhancement of natural wildlife habitats and wildlife corridors and preservation and enhancement <br />of streambeds and channels in a natural state, respectively. Program 1.6 directs the analysis of <br />impacts on wildlife populations and habitats prior to project development. Program 1.12 supports <br />reduced development intensity adjacent to areas designated as Wildland Overlay. Program 6.4 <br />would pursue opportunities to retain areas of the Wildland Overlay as permanent open space use <br />through various tools including acquisition, conservation easements, and establishment of a land <br />trust. Water Element Program 2.1 would provide for the preservation and restoration of riparian <br />corridors and establish mitigation requirements for modifications of such corridors. Program 2.2 <br />would develop policies and standards in cooperation with Zone 7 that include restoring riparian <br />corridors when flood and erosion control activities require channelization. Program 2.4 would direct <br />the design of projects adjacent to the arroyos to protect habitat areas. Water Element Program 6.2 <br />would establish reduced intensity for the development of land adjacent to areas designated as <br />Wildland Overlay through studies which indicate the types of development posing the least potential <br />negative impact on wildlife habitat. Future development consistent with the Housing Element <br />Update would be required to comply with adopted State, federal, and local regulations for the <br />protection of riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities. In addition, future <br />development would comply with requirements of the General Plan goals, policies, and programs <br />related to the protection of sensitive natural communities and riparian habitat, as described above. <br />Implementation of these goals, policies, programs, and State and federal requirements would reduce <br />impacts; however, the potential for impacts to special-status species, migratory species, and nesting