Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 97 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />The project applicant or sponsor shall ensure that, if development of habitat <br />occupied by special-status species, migratory or nesting birds must occur as <br />determined by a qualified Biologist and/or Wetland Regulatory Specialist, species <br />impacts shall be avoided or minimized, and, if required by a regulatory agency or the <br />CEQA process, loss of wildlife habitat or individual plants shall be fully compensated <br />on a site. If on-site mitigation is not feasible in the City’s or regulatory agency’s <br />discretion, it shall occur within the City of Pleasanton Planning Area whenever <br />possible, with a priority given to existing habitat mitigation banks. Habitat mitigation <br />shall be accompanied by a long-term management plan and monitoring program <br />prepared by a qualified Biologist and include provisions for protection of mitigation <br />lands in perpetuity through the establishment of easements and adequate funding <br />for maintenance and monitoring; the time frame for the funding shall be detailed in <br />the long-term management plan and monitoring program completed prior to <br />disturbance of occupied habitat. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: There were 19 special-status plant species and 29 special-status wildlife <br />species within approximately 5 miles of the potential sites for rezoning. The habitats these sensitive <br />plant species are usually located in (chaparral, serpentine soils, riparian woodland, marshes, or <br />swamps) are not generally found within the potential sites. Similarly, the potential sites for rezoning <br />do not generally contain habitat that would support most sensitive wildlife species. Rather, sensitive <br />wildlife species would most likely be found in the surrounding undeveloped hillsides present in the <br />Planning Area (e.g., potential oak woodland habitat that could occur within Site 1). Wildlife species <br />adapted to urban environments, such as birds and bats, may find suitable nesting habitat in <br />urbanized areas within buildings and other human-made structures where most of the rezoning is <br />proposed. Rezoning would primarily occur on infill parcels that have been previously developed. <br />However, Sites 1 (Lester), 3 (PUSD-Donlon), 14 (St. Elizabeth Seton), 21a and b (Kiewit), 22 (Merritt), <br />26 (St. Augustine), 27 (PUSD-Vineyard), 29 (Oracle) and portions of Site 24 (Sonoma Drive) are <br />vacant. Therefore, subsequent development consistent with the Housing Element Update could <br />result in the direct/indirect loss or indirect disturbance of special-status plant or animal species or <br />their habitats. <br />The General Plan includes policies and programs specifically designed to address potential impacts <br />on special-status species. Chapter 7, Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan, <br />Policy 1 requires the preservation and enhancement of natural wildlife habitats and wildlife corridors <br />and Programs 1.1- 1.6 provide policy-based mitigation for special-status species. Program 1.1 <br />requires the completion of a comprehensive study of the ecosystems and habitat areas within the <br />Planning Area. Program 1.2 requires the identification of land within the Planning Area which could <br />be reclaimed as viable wildlife habitat, study methods to re-establish viable plant and animal <br />communities in these areas and development of standards to accomplish habitat reclamation to <br />ensure the protection and use of wildlife corridors. Program 1.3 helps to preserve wetlands through <br />project development design measures. Program 1.4 outlines measures to preserve wildlife corridors <br />and establish mitigation requirements which minimize the barriers across wildlife corridors. Program <br />1.5 requires investigation of existing incentive programs that encourage property owners to <br />cooperate in the preservation and restoration of wildlife habitat. Program 1.6 requires the analysis of