Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 73 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />development consistent with the Housing Element Update would not be expected to require or <br />result in new or expanded electricity, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities beyond those <br />already planned. Necessary extensions and/or upgrades would generally occur within existing utility <br />easements (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.15-30–33). <br />Potential Effect <br />Impact UTIL-3: Development consistent with the Housing Element Update, rezonings, and General <br />Plan and Specific Plan Amendments would not result in a determination by the wastewater <br />treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the <br />project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. (Draft Program EIR, <br />Page 3.15-39). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The projected maximum wastewater generation for development <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update would equal approximately 2.17 mgd. The RWTF and <br />LWRP serving the City of Pleasanton would have a combined capacity to treat up to 26.1 mgd plus <br />the current LAVWMA pipeline discharge capacity of 41.2 mgd. The 2.17 mgd of wastewater <br />generated by new development consistent with the Housing Element Update would represent less <br />than 5 percent of total treatment capacity of the RWTF and LWRP. The RWTF and LWRP would have <br />the capacity to handle the increase in wastewater. The City has entered into numerous sewage <br />reservation agreements that guarantee capacity to various properties/projects. The City has secured <br />capacity for its continued existing and future wastewater flows. The City’s capacity in the discharge <br />pipeline would allow growth in dry-weather flows as well as accommodate its wet-weather flows for <br />many future years. <br />The General Plan includes policies and actions to ensure that wastewater treatment capacity keeps <br />pace with new development. Chapter 8, Water Element, of the General Plan Goal 5 is to provide <br />adequate sewage treatment and minimize wastewater export. Policy 5 requires the City to secure <br />sewage capacity through all available means for residential, commercial, and industrial <br />development. All new development is required to pay its fair share of the City’s planned sewer <br />system improvements including treatment, distribution, reuse, and export facilities. Policy 6 provides <br />for approval of only those sewage collection, treatment, and export expansion alternatives which are <br />cost- and energy efficient and do not create a health hazard, and Policy 7 supports cost-effective and <br />environmentally sensitive approaches to wastewater reuse in the Tri-Valley. New development would <br />be subject to the latest adopted edition of the California Plumbing Code and CALGreen Code <br />including the provisions for water efficient fixtures and toilets. Development would be <br />predominantly on vacant or underutilized parcels and would be connected to the municipal sewer <br />system. Prior to development on Sites 1 (Lester) and 22 (Merritt), those sites would be annexed into <br />Pleasanton and would connect to the City’s wastewater infrastructure. Fair share connection fees <br />would be required for all new development. <br />The SSMP is audited bi-annually and updated every 5 years. These updates allow for the <br />consideration of development and redevelopment such as would occur consistent with the Housing