Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 65 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />Element Update, there may be an additional need to increase staffing and equipment to maintain <br />acceptable service ratios and other performance objectives for these other public facilities. However, <br />this would require existing public facilities to be able to accommodate the additional staff and/or <br />equipment. If an existing public facility is at capacity for staffing, this could require an expansion of <br />an existing public facility or construction of a new public facility, the construction of which could <br />cause environmental impacts. The General Plan includes policies and programs to ensure that public <br />facilities keep pace with new development. Program 2.1 of Policy 2 of Goal 3 in Chapter 6, Public <br />Facilities and Community Programs Element, requires development to pay its fair share of costs <br />related to the purchasing of sites and financing of improvements for existing and future municipal <br />facilities, including public facilities such as City Hall and cultural arts centers. Policy 18 of Goal 8 in <br />Chapter 6, Public Facilities and Community Programs Element, requires the City to provide additional <br />public facilities to enhance the community and Policy 22 requires the City of facilitate provision of <br />safe, affordable, and high quality childcare facilities and services to families. As the City proceeds <br />with the construction of new or expanded public facilities, those projects would be reviewed by the <br />City for compliance with the policies and programs of the General Plan and Municipal Code. <br />Furthermore, as the City receives development applications for subsequent development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update, those applications will be reviewed by the City for compliance <br />with the policies and programs of the General Plan to ensure that other facilities keep pace with new <br />development. In addition, development consistent with the Housing Element Update would be <br />required to pay capital facilities fees in accordance with Chapter 3.22 of the Municipal Code (Draft <br />Program EIR, Page 3.13-35–36). <br />Potential Effect <br />Impact PSR-6: Development consistent with the Housing Element Update, rezonings, and General <br />Plan and Specific Plan Amendments would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and <br />regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated. (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.13-36). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: Assuming maximum buildout of the potential sites for rezoning, <br />construction of 93 ADUs, and a density of 75 dwelling unit/acre (du/acre) for the Dublin-Pleasanton <br />BART station property, a conservative population estimate by 2031 is 96,400 residents. The City <br />conducted an analysis of the suitability of the various proposed housing sites to identify locations <br />that would meet certain criteria. Many of the proposed sites are within 0.5 mile walking distance of <br />a neighborhood or community park, which provides greater accessibility and is a goal of the General <br />Plan as mentioned in Program 10.8 of Policy 10 of Chapter 6, Public Facilities and Community <br />Programs Element, of the General Plan, above. The City maintains a park service standard of over 5 <br />acres of all park and open space types per 1,000 residents, consistent with Program 10.8. Based on <br />the City’s projected population of 96,400 by 2031, an additional approximately 100 acres of <br />neighborhood parkland would be needed by 2031 to achieve the service standard of 5 acres of <br />parkland per 1,000 residents; with the projected population of 96,400, the City would maintain an <br />open space ratio of 10.5 per 1,000 residents, which would be well above the target ratio. As the <br />demand for parks and recreational facilities increases, there may be a need to increase staffing and