Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />58 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />of the potential sites for rezoning to accommodate housing development. Therefore, development <br />of housing facilitated by the Housing Element Update would not displace substantial numbers of <br />existing people or housing and would instead build housing on infill sites with access to existing <br />infrastructure and public services (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.12-18). <br />Potential Effect <br />Cumulative Impact: Cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than <br />significant (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.12-18–21). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The geographic scope of the cumulative impact analysis for population <br />and housing is the Tri-Valley Planning Area, which includes the City of Pleasanton as well as the <br />surrounding cities of Dublin, Livermore, and San Ramon and the Town of Danville. Each city and <br />county must update its general plan housing element on a regular basis pursuant to the <br />requirements of Government Code Section 65580, et seq. The housing element must incorporate <br />policies and identify potential sites that would accommodate a city’s share of the regional housing <br />need. There is existing residential zoned capacity and approved but not yet constructed projects <br />within the City of Pleasanton that could result in additional housing within the city. Based on <br />residential units/capacity for the existing sites zoned for residential uses, projected ADUs (8-year <br />projection, based on the last 5 years of average annual production), and pipeline projects (projects <br />entitled but not yet built), the number of units that could be built within Pleasanton would be 2,486 <br />units. Assuming factors of 2.99, 2.48, and 2.2 persons per household for low-, medium-, and high- <br />density housing types, respectively, this existing zoned and pipeline capacity could result in an <br />additional population of 5,963. <br />Housing element updates for each of the jurisdictions would allow for population growth but, for the <br />reasons listed below, it would not be unplanned. Pleasanton is part of Superdistrict 15, East Alameda <br />County, which includes Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore and the eastern portion of unincorporated <br />Alameda County. This Superdistrict is projected to grow by 60,000 households for a total of 132,000 <br />households by 2050 (interim year forecasts are not provided). The increase of 21,606 units in each <br />jurisdiction’s RHNA would be well within the forecast total. Because each city’s housing element <br />would accommodate the required housing and associated population growth as required by the <br />RHNA (which is consistent with and planned for in Plan Bay Area 2050), the respective housing <br />element updates for the jurisdictions described above would also be consistent with Plan Bay Area <br />2050. <br />The general plans and other planning documents prepared by the City of Pleasanton as well as the <br />surrounding cities of Dublin, Livermore, and San Ramon and the Town of Danville would be required <br />to develop land use plans that comply with State law and that would accommodate the existing and <br />forecasted population, similar to the long-range planning guidance included as part of the Housing <br />Element Update. Consistent with State law, these planning documents would be required to provide <br />adequate housing to accommodate forecasted numbers of people within the jurisdiction, and <br />displaced development, if any, would be replaced primarily within the jurisdiction. Further, new