My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02 ATTACHMENT 1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
02 ATTACHMENT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
02
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />58 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />of the potential sites for rezoning to accommodate housing development. Therefore, development <br />of housing facilitated by the Housing Element Update would not displace substantial numbers of <br />existing people or housing and would instead build housing on infill sites with access to existing <br />infrastructure and public services (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.12-18). <br />Potential Effect <br />Cumulative Impact: Cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than <br />significant (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.12-18–21). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The geographic scope of the cumulative impact analysis for population <br />and housing is the Tri-Valley Planning Area, which includes the City of Pleasanton as well as the <br />surrounding cities of Dublin, Livermore, and San Ramon and the Town of Danville. Each city and <br />county must update its general plan housing element on a regular basis pursuant to the <br />requirements of Government Code Section 65580, et seq. The housing element must incorporate <br />policies and identify potential sites that would accommodate a city’s share of the regional housing <br />need. There is existing residential zoned capacity and approved but not yet constructed projects <br />within the City of Pleasanton that could result in additional housing within the city. Based on <br />residential units/capacity for the existing sites zoned for residential uses, projected ADUs (8-year <br />projection, based on the last 5 years of average annual production), and pipeline projects (projects <br />entitled but not yet built), the number of units that could be built within Pleasanton would be 2,486 <br />units. Assuming factors of 2.99, 2.48, and 2.2 persons per household for low-, medium-, and high- <br />density housing types, respectively, this existing zoned and pipeline capacity could result in an <br />additional population of 5,963. <br />Housing element updates for each of the jurisdictions would allow for population growth but, for the <br />reasons listed below, it would not be unplanned. Pleasanton is part of Superdistrict 15, East Alameda <br />County, which includes Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore and the eastern portion of unincorporated <br />Alameda County. This Superdistrict is projected to grow by 60,000 households for a total of 132,000 <br />households by 2050 (interim year forecasts are not provided). The increase of 21,606 units in each <br />jurisdiction’s RHNA would be well within the forecast total. Because each city’s housing element <br />would accommodate the required housing and associated population growth as required by the <br />RHNA (which is consistent with and planned for in Plan Bay Area 2050), the respective housing <br />element updates for the jurisdictions described above would also be consistent with Plan Bay Area <br />2050. <br />The general plans and other planning documents prepared by the City of Pleasanton as well as the <br />surrounding cities of Dublin, Livermore, and San Ramon and the Town of Danville would be required <br />to develop land use plans that comply with State law and that would accommodate the existing and <br />forecasted population, similar to the long-range planning guidance included as part of the Housing <br />Element Update. Consistent with State law, these planning documents would be required to provide <br />adequate housing to accommodate forecasted numbers of people within the jurisdiction, and <br />displaced development, if any, would be replaced primarily within the jurisdiction. Further, new
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.