Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 49 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />pervious surfaces in new developments and requiring projects to meet federal, State, regional, and <br />local stormwater requirements, including stormwater infiltration (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.9-36). <br />Potential Effect <br />Cumulative Impact: Cumulative impacts related to hydrology and water quality would be less than <br />significant. (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.9-36). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The geographic context for an analysis of cumulative impacts is the <br />Eastern Alameda Creek watershed, which encompasses about 675 square miles between Mount <br />Hamilton and Mount Diablo. Cumulative development in the watershed contributes to an incremental <br />increase in impervious surfaces that could introduce pollutants that are typically associated with urban <br />runoff into the stormwater and/or contribute to cumulative flood conditions in the watershed. <br />Cumulative development could also contribute to water quality impacts in the watershed from <br />construction activities. Cumulative impacts would be less than significant because future cumulative <br />development, infrastructure, and planning projects would be subject to local, State, and federal permit <br />requirements and would be required to comply with City and Alameda County ordinances and policies, <br />as well as other water quality regulations that control construction-related and operational discharge <br />of pollutants in stormwater. The water quality regulations implemented by the RWQCB take a basin- <br />wide approach and consider water quality impairment in a regional context that addresses the entire <br />geographic context of the Eastern Alameda Creek Watershed. <br />The Housing Element Update’s less than significant incremental contribution to less than significant <br />cumulative impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. As discussed above, development <br />resulting from implementation of the Housing Element Update would be subject to General Plan <br />policies and programs and the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance to reduce hydrology and <br />water quality impacts. As previously discussed, future development consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update would be required to conform to federal, State, and local policies that would reduce <br />hydrology and water quality impacts to less than significant levels. If applicable, any additional new <br />development consistent with the Housing Element Update would be subject, on a project-by-project <br />basis, to independent CEQA review. More specifically, potential changes related to stormwater <br />quality, stormwater flows, drainage, impervious surfaces, and flooding would be minimized by the <br />implementation of stormwater control measures, infiltration, and review by the City Engineer to <br />integrate measures to reduce potential flooding impacts (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.9-36–37). <br />1.5.10 - Land Use <br />Potential Effect <br />Impact LAND-1: Development consistent with the Housing Element Update, rezonings, and General <br />Plan and Specific Plan Amendments would not physically divide an established community. (Draft <br />Program EIR, Page 3.10-10). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact.