My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02 ATTACHMENT 1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
02 ATTACHMENT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:43:46 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
02
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />14 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />cumulative impact analysis for aesthetics is the immediate vicinity of the identified potential sites for <br />housing, as well as the rest of the City and surrounding cities of Dublin, Livermore, and San Ramon <br />and the Town of Danville. <br />Visual Character and Views: The potential sites for housing, the rest of the City, and the surrounding <br />cities are primarily urbanized and built out. Future development in the cumulative context would <br />include predominantly infill residential, commercial, and industrial development consistent with the <br />General Plans of each municipality. The geographic area contains many natural features such as <br />hillsides and ridgelines, as well as extensive open spaces, arroyos, and canals. Future development <br />would be subject to the design review processes of the individual jurisdiction, and the applicable <br />land use plans containing policies and implementing programs to preserve visual character, land use <br />compatibility, and views in those jurisdictions. Future development consistent with the Housing <br />Element Update and cumulative development would be subject to specific regulations and <br />guidelines related to building heights, setbacks, undergrounding of utilities, landscaping, signage, <br />and permitted land uses. These regulations would ensure that visual character and viewsheds are <br />maintained and/or enhanced. Therefore, the Housing Element Update’s contribution would not be <br />cumulatively considerable. <br />Light and Glare: All cumulative development would consist primarily of infill development such as <br />streetlights, exterior lighting, safety lighting, lighting from vehicles, and sources of glare from the <br />buildings and vehicles. Local regulations related to light and glare would be applicable to all <br />cumulative development. Lighting and exterior building materials associated with the Housing <br />Element Update and cumulative development would be subject to administrative design review by <br />the various jurisdictions. This process would ensure appropriate building materials are utilized, <br />building windows are tinted to minimize interior light transmission, and exterior lighting is designed <br />so that it is directed downward and away from adjacent properties. All future development <br />consistent with the Housing Element Update and cumulative development would increase light and <br />glare compared to existing conditions. However, adherence to the administrative design review <br />process and standards of each applicable jurisdiction would minimize the light and glare impacts for <br />the Housing Element Update and cumulative development. Therefore, the Housing Element <br />Update’s contribution would not be cumulatively considerable (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.1-25–27). <br />1.5.2 - Air Quality <br />Potential Effect <br />Impact AIR-4: Development consistent with the Housing Element Update, rezonings, and General <br />Plan and Specific Plan Amendments would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to <br />odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.2-58). <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: As described in the BAAQMD’s 2017 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, land <br />uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment <br />plants, landfills, and certain industrial operations. The city contains several of the land uses listed by <br />the BAAQMD as potential odor sources, such as the Dublin-San Ramon Wastewater Treatment Plant,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.