Laserfiche WebLink
Objective Design Standards for Housing Sites <br />City of Pleasanton - 13 - DRAFT: December 14, 2022 <br />shall be provided. <br />Multiple Family Development <br />A1.8 At least 75 percent of Internal Streets and Paseos shall provide connection to adjacent streets and <br />neighboring development and be publicly accessible, unless demonstrated to be infeasible by the <br />applicant due to demonstrated topographic constraints, existing infrastructure, or other jurisdictional <br />restrictions. <br />Single Family Tract Development <br />Single Family Home and Multiple Single Family Development shall comply with the following site <br />design standards: <br />A1.9 Subdivision of property for Single Family Home or Multiple Single Family Home development on <br />designated Housing Element Inventory sites shall comply with the following standards: <br />a. The sideline of all lots shall be at right angles to the street which the lot faces, or approximately <br />radial to the center of curvature, if such street is curved. Side lines of lots shall be approximately <br />radial to the center of curvature of a cul-de-sac on which the lot faces. <br />b. Corner lots for residential use shall be platted wider than interior lots in order to permit <br />conformance with the required street side yard requirements of Title 18 of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code. <br />c. No lot shall be divided by a city boundary line. <br />d. No remnants of property shall remain which do not conform to lot requirements or are not required <br />for a private, public utility or other public purpose. <br />A1.10 Internal Streets located within proposed residential subdivisions shall comply with the following standards <br />a. Streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the land to be subdivided, unless demonstrated to <br />be infeasible by topography or other physical conditions. <br />b. A maximum of 15 percent or one, whichever is greater, of the total number of Internal Streets shall <br />be allowed to exceed 150 feet from intersection centerline without a connection to an Internal <br />Street at both ends of the segment. <br />c. At least 25 percent of Internal Streets and Paseos shall provide connection to adjacent streets and <br />neighboring development and be publicly accessible, unless demonstrated to be infeasible by the <br />applicant due to demonstrated topographic constraints, existing infrastructure, or other <br />jurisdictional restrictions. <br />A1.11 Private Driveways proposed for Single Family Home or Multiple Single Family Home development on <br />designated Housing Element Inventory sites shall comply with the following standards: <br />a. One drive shall be allowed for each 70 feet of lot frontage on a public street at interior parcels <br />b. Corner parcels shall be allowed to locate a maximum of one drive for every 70 feet of frontage on <br />each public street, except if the applicant commissions a traffic study by a licensed engineer <br />concluding that additional drives do not create an unsafe condition for pedestrians and drivers. <br />c. No private drive shall exceed the total maximum width allowed in R districts by the Off Street <br />Parking requirements of the Pleasanton Municipal Code <br />d. Prive drives shall be allowed to be shared between adjacent properties with a dedicated Access <br />Easement <br />e. A proposed drive exceeding 150 feet in length shall provide a minimum of 20 feet of clear width; <br />dedicate a Public Access Easement; and comply with the turnaround provisions required by the <br />California Fire Code. <br /> Page: 17 <br />Author: Steve Subject: Note Date: 12/16/2022 8:38:50 AM <br />City should provide exhibits Author: Steve Subject: Note Date: 12/19/2022 1:28:29 PM This should be redefined to "Private Access Drives" or something similar. Driveways could include a normal 18' driveway apron, but I think the intent is to cover motorcourts or long access drives that are used exclusively by a house or houses and not meant for general circulation Author: Steve Subject: Note Date: 12/19/2022 3:58:59 PM It is not clear what this standard requires. <br />Attachment 4 - ODS Public Comments - 01-26-23 CC - Page 15