My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
03 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:44:45 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:19:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
03
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Since the self-guided tour earlier this year, and in preparation for the current (6th Cycle) <br />Housing Element update, staff and the VMWP team has been working on revising the 2012 <br />Housing DG. Two documents are enclosed with this report, a redline version showing the <br />proposed modifications to the 2012 Housing DG (Exhibit A) using strikeout and underline text, <br />and for ease of review and reading, a version that incorporates these changes (Exhibit 8). The <br />Planning Commission may wish to focus its review on the "clean" version (Exhibit B), which is <br />more readable, with reference back to Exhibit A (redline version) to understand the nature of <br />specific changes made to a particular standard or guideline. <br />Changes to Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines <br />Key highlights of proposed changes are summarized below. As noted, the majority of these <br />changes have been introduced to provide a quantified, objective standards in the place of what <br />are currently subjective guidelines. In other areas, standards have been strengthened or <br />augmented to address deficiencies or gaps in the existing Housing DG. <br />Part 1 (Introduction), Part 2 (PUD Regulations), and Part 4 (Process) <br />At this time, no changes are proposed to the Introduction (inclusive of the purpose and vision <br />statement), PUD Regulations3 and Process sections of the document since the focus of the <br />current update is technical in nature. Staff expects, however, that a future draft of the <br />document will modify wording regarding review and procedure of projects subject to the <br />objective design standards, as appropriate to comply with applicable provisions of state law. <br />Changes to the technical aspects of Part 2, PUD Regulations, are summarized as follows: <br />•Rear yard setback for accessory structures. The proposed amendments indicate a rear <br />setback of five feet for accessory structures such as trash enclosures, carports, bike <br />storage, and other allowed accessory structures, where no rear setback was previously <br />established. <br />•Reference to AB 2923 for the BART site and State Density Bonus. Assembly Bill (AB) <br />2923, adopted in 2018, establishes a minimum density of 75 dwelling units per acre and <br />a minimum of five stories, among other standards, for BART-owned property. <br />Therefore, the revisions to the Housing DG refer to AB 2923 in the sections that refer to <br />density and height for the BART site. Similarly, the density noted in Table 2.1 is <br />proposed to be footnoted to indicate that the notated density may be exceeded in <br />accordance with the State Density Bonus for a qualified project, consistent with state <br />law. <br />•Group usable open space. The proposed amendments would establish a tiered <br />standard for group usable open space, depending on project density. For projects up to <br />40 dwelling units per acre, the existing group usable open space requirement of 300 <br />square feet per dwelling unit would remain, but as an option, the proposed amendments <br />would allow 250 square feet per unit of group usable open space if the project provides <br />a public plaza or park with dedicated public access -effectively an incentive to provide <br />publicly-accessible open space. The amendments would establish a ratio of 250 square <br />feet and 200 square feet of group usable open space per unit for projects of densities <br />3 Changes are in fact proposed to the development standards cited in the PUD Regulations section of the <br />document, as discussed in this report <br />P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />6 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.